MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416501492 · doi:10.1007/s44187-025-00665-3

The influence of farm production diversity on women’s dietary quality in Ethiopia

2025· article· en· W4416501492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Food · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity College CorkInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsDiversity (politics)AgricultureDietary diversityFood groupDiversity indexProduction (economics)Logistic regressionOdds

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malnutrition remains a significant global challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, such as Ethiopia, where the great majority of smallholder farm households rely on agriculture as a crucial source of both food and income. Diverse agricultural production has the potential to improve the quality of the diet and combat malnutrition. The linkage between agricultural production diversity and dietary quality, however, remains debated. In this study, we used three distinct techniques - food group production diversity, species count (crop and livestock), and Simpson Diversity Index - as measures of farm production diversity to assess the effect of production diversity on the women’s dietary quality, assessed in terms of dietary diversity score, minimum dietary diversity for women and nutrient mean adequacy ratio. Three different regression models, namely Poisson, logistic and OLS, were employed on a sample of 1,910 women of reproductive age from farming households selected using a multistage sampling technique in five regions of Ethiopia. The finding indicates that food group production diversity has a significant and positive association with all the dietary quality indicators, a one unit increase in food group production diversity increases dietary diversity by 0.013 at ( p < 0.05), increases the mean adequacy ratio by 3.1% at ( p < 0.01) and increases the odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity by 27.5% at ( p < 0.01). Furthermore, the species count has a significant and positive association with minimum dietary diversity for women. A one-unit increase in the species count increases the odds of achieving minimum dietary diversity by 1.5% at ( p < 0.05) but has significant influence on dietary diversity and mean adequacy ratio. The Simpson Diversity Index exhibits a significant and positive association with dietary diversity and minimum dietary diversity for women but shows no relationship with the mean adequacy ratio. Despite some variation between the measures, these findings suggest that a more diversified production system enhances the dietary diversity and nutrient adequacy of women within farm households, particularly minimum dietary diversity for women, supporting the potential of diversified agricultural systems to improve nutritional outcomes. This can be achieved by raising awareness and knowledge of the benefits of more diversified farming, and equipping farmers them with the skills to diversify their production systems, along with the provision of technical and financial support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it