MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416580114 · doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-6699

Machine Learning Surrogates for Unreinforced Masonry Tensile-Strength Prediction

2025· article· en· W4416580114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSurrogate modelComputational modelParametric statisticsMasonryUnreinforced masonry buildingContext (archaeology)Predictive modellingSensitivity (control systems)Uncertainty quantification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With advances in computational modeling, finite- or discrete-element method-based computational models are often used to conduct nonlinear structural analysis of masonry construction. However, such detailed models are computationally intensive, limiting their usefulness in preliminary analysis or applications requiring real-time simulations (e.g., developing digital twins). A possible solution, increasingly used in other building science areas (e.g., energy efficiency), is developing machine-learning-based surrogate models that mimic the performance of complex physics-based simulation models at significantly reduced computational costs. However, little is known about the premise of this approach in the context of masonry tensile strength prediction due to the scarcity of such applications in the literature. This research proposes a framework to develop and evaluate the performance of machine learning surrogate models in emulating the performance of masonry tensile-strength prediction models. A five-step methodology is proposed: (1) develop computational physics-based models based on the discrete element method (DEM), (2) validate the proposed computational models, (3) generate a data set through parametric variations to support surrogate modeling, (4) train and test data-driven surrogate models to emulate the capabilities of the computational models, and (5) conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine the most influential input parameters. The presented generic approach is demonstrated using a validated discontinuum-based computational modeling strategy based on the DEM. The model predicts the tensile strength and corresponding strain value of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to diagonal compression forces. Results show that the gradient boosting (GB) surrogate models consistently achieved high accuracy levels (R2>0.9) even when using small data sets (e.g., 100 samples). However, compared to linear regression, GB exhibited increases in training and tuning time for large sample sizes. The proposed framework offers unique insights into the premise of data-driven surrogate models to complement and support computational-based techniques, balancing predictive accuracy and model complexity. Additional case studies are required to generalize results to other masonry configurations and contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it