MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416580114 · doi:10.1061/jccee5.cpeng-6699

Machine Learning Surrogates for Unreinforced Masonry Tensile-Strength Prediction

2025· article· en· W4416580114 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Elin Markarian, Elie Azar, Semih Gönen, Bora Pulatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSurrogate modelComputational modelParametric statisticsMasonryUnreinforced masonry buildingContext (archaeology)Predictive modellingSensitivity (control systems)Uncertainty quantification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With advances in computational modeling, finite- or discrete-element method-based computational models are often used to conduct nonlinear structural analysis of masonry construction. However, such detailed models are computationally intensive, limiting their usefulness in preliminary analysis or applications requiring real-time simulations (e.g., developing digital twins). A possible solution, increasingly used in other building science areas (e.g., energy efficiency), is developing machine-learning-based surrogate models that mimic the performance of complex physics-based simulation models at significantly reduced computational costs. However, little is known about the premise of this approach in the context of masonry tensile strength prediction due to the scarcity of such applications in the literature. This research proposes a framework to develop and evaluate the performance of machine learning surrogate models in emulating the performance of masonry tensile-strength prediction models. A five-step methodology is proposed: (1) develop computational physics-based models based on the discrete element method (DEM), (2) validate the proposed computational models, (3) generate a data set through parametric variations to support surrogate modeling, (4) train and test data-driven surrogate models to emulate the capabilities of the computational models, and (5) conduct a sensitivity analysis to determine the most influential input parameters. The presented generic approach is demonstrated using a validated discontinuum-based computational modeling strategy based on the DEM. The model predicts the tensile strength and corresponding strain value of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to diagonal compression forces. Results show that the gradient boosting (GB) surrogate models consistently achieved high accuracy levels (R2>0.9) even when using small data sets (e.g., 100 samples). However, compared to linear regression, GB exhibited increases in training and tuning time for large sample sizes. The proposed framework offers unique insights into the premise of data-driven surrogate models to complement and support computational-based techniques, balancing predictive accuracy and model complexity. Additional case studies are required to generalize results to other masonry configurations and contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computing in Civil EngineeringSame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207