MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416609846 · doi:10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-7676

Behavior of SCC One-Way Bridge Deck Slabs Reinforced with Basalt FRP Bars under Concentrated Wheel Loads

2025· article· en· W4416609846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bridge Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibre-reinforced plasticPolypropyleneBasalt fiberDeflection (physics)CrackingDeckReinforcementServiceability (structure)Slab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars have gained significant attention in fabricating bridge deck slabs—particularly in harsh environments—owing to their superior corrosion resistance. Because of the comparatively low modulus of elasticity of FRP bars, controlling deflection and crack width under service conditions is a key concern in flexural design. This investigation evaluated the effect of fiber addition on the serviceability of one-way bridge deck slabs made of self-consolidating concrete (SCC) reinforced with basalt fiber–reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars. Six full-scale one-way bridge deck slabs—representing typical North American slab-on-girder bridges—were tested. The tested slabs were 3,700 mm long, 1,000 mm wide, and 200 mm thick. They were loaded to failure using a concentrated 87.5 kN load, representing the contact area configuration of a CL-625 truck wheel as prescribed in the current design codes. The study variables included longitudinal reinforcement ratio (1.17% and 0.81%), reinforcement type (BFRP and steel), polypropylene fiber volume (0%, 0.5%, and 0.75%), and fiber combinations [macro polypropylene fibers and a hybrid of macro polypropylene and micro basalt (Ba) fibers]. The test results, including failure modes, cracking behavior, deflection responses, crack widths, along with strain measurements in both concrete and reinforcement, were presented and analyzed. The results revealed that adding fibers to the concrete matrix effectively reduced crack widths and deflections at both service and ultimate load conditions. At service load conditions, the inclusion of polypropylene fibers led to a reduction in crack width by 6.1%–14.3% and in midspan deflection by 6.7%–22.1% compared to the reference slab without fibers. Furthermore, using hybrid reinforcement consisting of macro polypropylene and micro basalt fibers at the same fiber volume (0.75%) resulted in further performance gains, reducing midspan deflection by 11.2% and crack width by 42.8% relative to slabs containing only polypropylene fibers. In contrast, the fibers had a negligible impact on the ultimate load-carrying capacity of the slabs. Conversely, raising the BFRP reinforcement ratio from 0.81% to 1.17% improved the ultimate capacity by nearly 29%. Lastly, the experimental cracking load, deflection, and crack widths were evaluated against current design codes and guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it