MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling the Future: Groundwater Responses to Climate Change in Talomo-Lipadas Watershed, Davao City, Philippines

2025· article· en· W4416609968 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nympha E. Branzuela

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Environment and Pollution Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommission on Higher EducationInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeBaseflowClimate changeGroundwaterWater scarcityDownscalingHydrology (agriculture)MODFLOWWater resources

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research investigates the long-term impact of climate change on groundwater recharge (seepage) within the Talomo-Lipadas Watershed, Davao City, Philippines, over the next eighty-nine (89) years. Employing the Statistical Downscaling Method (SDSM), stationscale climate scenarios were generated for three future time slices centered on 2020 (2011-20140), 2050 (2041-2070), and 2080 (2071-2100). These scenarios, indicating a projected increase in temperature within the watershed, were then used as input for the BROOK90 hydrological model to simulate groundwater recharge. The modelling results project a decline in groundwater supply from 109.01 million cubic meters (MCM) in 2020 to 103.53 MCM in 2050 and further down to 99.81 MCM by 2080. This projected decrease in groundwater recharge has significant implications beyond just water availability. Reduced groundwater flow can impact baseflow in rivers, affecting aquatic ecosystems and potentially exacerbating water scarcity during dry periods. Decreased recharge also has implications for other water-related sectors, including agriculture (irrigation), industry (water supply), and domestic water use, potentially leading to increased competition for dwindling resources. These findings underscore the urgent need for adaptation strategies to mitigate the effects of climate change on groundwater recharge within the Talomo-Lipadas Watershed. Further research employing diverse hydrological models is recommended to validate these findings and provide a more robust basis for developing sustainable water management plans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Environment and Pollution TechnologySame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207