Comparative Analysis of Scalable IoT Topologies for Optimal and Precise Greenhouse Environment Monitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precision agriculture is vital for optimizing parameters for plant growth and health particularly in controlled environments like greenhouses. The Internet of Things (IoT) is a driver of this, and Wireless Sensor Networks provide a structured approach for data acquisition in these environments. While WSNs are widely implemented, there is limited empirical comparison of signal performance metrics across different sensor motes. This study presents a comparative analysis using the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) parameter of two different IoT devices, Iris Mote and Zolertia RE-Mote in a greenhouse environment, specifically at the K.C. Irving Environmental Science Centre Greenhouse at Acadia University. Results indicate that the Zolertia RE-Mote offers superior range, processing power, and energy efficiency, making it better suited for scalable deployments. These findings highlight the importance of environment specific testing for WSN deployment in precision agriculture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it