MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Expanding Your Horizons

2020· book-chapter· en· W4416652295 on OpenAlexaff
Judith Iriarte-Gross, Myra Norman, Monika Whitfield

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGateway (web page)State (computer science)Women in scienceNatural resourceSocial network (sociolinguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Expanding Your Horizons Network (EYHN), created in 1974 by a group of women scientists and educators in the San Francisco Bay Area, is the preeminent source for resources and experiences that provide focused engagement of middle school girls from all backgrounds in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). At its core is the EYHN’s unique nationwide network of STEM conferences called Expanding Your Horizons (EYH). These conferences provide a gateway to empowering girls to see themselves as future participants in STEM and STEM-related careers. By engaging with female STEM role models and participating in hands-on activities, girls can envision themselves pursuing STEM education and careers. The Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) EYH Conference was the first of five EYH conferences that currently operate in Tennessee. The conference, which addresses social and environmental factors that tend to shape girls’ interest in STEM, has introduced more than 7,200 girls to STEM careers since 1997. Data from MTSU EYH show a significant impact on the girls’ attitudes about STEM and STEM careers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.044

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScience Education and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207