MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Expanding Your Horizons

2020· book-chapter· en· W4416652295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsHorizon Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGateway (web page)State (computer science)Women in scienceNatural resourceSocial network (sociolinguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Expanding Your Horizons Network (EYHN), created in 1974 by a group of women scientists and educators in the San Francisco Bay Area, is the preeminent source for resources and experiences that provide focused engagement of middle school girls from all backgrounds in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). At its core is the EYHN’s unique nationwide network of STEM conferences called Expanding Your Horizons (EYH). These conferences provide a gateway to empowering girls to see themselves as future participants in STEM and STEM-related careers. By engaging with female STEM role models and participating in hands-on activities, girls can envision themselves pursuing STEM education and careers. The Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) EYH Conference was the first of five EYH conferences that currently operate in Tennessee. The conference, which addresses social and environmental factors that tend to shape girls’ interest in STEM, has introduced more than 7,200 girls to STEM careers since 1997. Data from MTSU EYH show a significant impact on the girls’ attitudes about STEM and STEM careers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3520.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScience Education and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207