MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416724101 · doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02585-y

Radiative Transfer in Solar Prominences: An Overview and Current Trends

2025· article· en· W4416724101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniwersytet WrocławskiKU LeuvenAkademie Věd České RepublikyGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsOrbiterSolar prominenceCoronagraphRadiative transferCurrent (fluid)Focus (optics)Solar physicsSolar SystemCurrent sheet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We review the development of the non-LTE (i.e. departures from Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium) radiative-transfer modeling of cool coronal condensations, namely solar prominences. The period considered covers five decades, but we particularly focus on current trends and advancements. Our main goal is to critically discuss various issues of the model geometries and how the assumed geometry couples to the specification of the incident illumination from the surrounding atmosphere. We start with initial one-dimensional (1D) models and continue with the discussion of 2D models and the current 3D approaches. A special attention is devoted to highly heterogeneous prominence structures and to fast-moving eruptive prominences currently well observed by the Metis and EUI instruments onboard Solar Orbiter and by the ASPIICS large coronagraph onboard the Proba-3 formation-flight mission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it