MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416784146 · doi:10.1017/s000497272510066x

GENERALISED MAZUR’S GROWTH NUMBER CONJECTURE

2025· article· en· W4416784146 on OpenAlexafffund
Debanjana Kundu, Antonio Lei

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMeromorphic and Entire Functions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAssociation for Women in MathematicsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComplex multiplicationConjectureElliptic curveAbelian groupMultiplication (music)Modular elliptic curveExtension (predicate logic)Variety (cybernetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let F be a totally real field. Let sans serif upper A $\mathsf {A}$ A be a simple modular self-dual abelian variety defined over F . We study the growth of the corank of Selmer groups of sans serif upper A $\mathsf {A}$ A over upper Z Subscript p $\mathbb {Z}_p$ Z p -extensions of a complex multiplication (CM) extension of F . We propose an extension of Mazur’s growth number conjecture for elliptic curves to this new setting. We provide evidence supporting an affirmative answer by studying special cases of this problem, generalising previous results on elliptic curves and imaginary quadratic fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Australian Mathematical SocietySame topicMeromorphic and Entire FunctionsFrench-language works237,207