MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416784919 · doi:10.1002/cjce.70188

<scp>A</scp> novel <scp>proportional‐integral‐derivative</scp> ‐type iterative learning control strategy based on <scp>2D</scp> model predictive iterative learning control optimization for batch processes with partial actuator failures

2025· article· en· W4416784919 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterative learning controlSetpointControl theory (sociology)ActuatorController (irrigation)Tracking errorConvergence (economics)PID controllerProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For control problems involving partial actuator failures during batch processes, this paper proposes a novel proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID)‐type iterative learning control strategy based on two‐dimensional model predictive iterative learning control optimization. First, a two‐dimensional extended non‐minimal state space model was constructed using actuator outputs, process variable outputs, and tracking error information, providing more freedom for subsequent controller design. At the same time, a setpoint learning strategy was constructed by introducing historical batch error information. Secondly, a novel model was constructed by combining the two‐dimensional extended non‐minimal state space model and the setpoint learning strategy, which significantly improved the iterative learning ability of the corresponding controller. Furthermore, a novel PID‐type iterative learning controller is constructed by combining an incremental PID controller and a traditional PID‐type iterative learning controller. Finally, the designed control law is used to optimize the parameters of the PID‐type iterative learning controller in real time, ensuring that the control system can simultaneously achieve control performance along the time axis and convergence performance along the batch axis. Based on the model mismatch in the injection moulding machine holding pressure control system, the effectiveness of the proposed strategy was verified by considering two types of partial actuator failures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it