MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416876978 · doi:10.37665/smapyyb87005

The Influence of Solder Void Location on BGA Thermal Fatigue Life

2010· article· W4416876978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMTA International · 2010
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsHain Celestial (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBall grid arraySolderingVoid (composites)Temperature cyclingPrinted circuit boardReliability (semiconductor)Surface-mount technologyThermal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper addresses the effect of solder process voiding on the board level, thermal fatigue reliability of a large body 680 I/O plastic ball grid array (PBGA). The study is a subset of a much larger ongoing investigation of Pb-free reliability using the PBGA package as the primary test vehicle. Different assembly process parameters were used to generate localized voiding at either the package or the printed circuit board side of the solder joints. The fatigue performance was measured using accelerated temperature cycling with a 0°C to 100°C thermal cycle. Baseline microstructural analysis and post-cycling failure analysis was conducted on representative test samples from each cell. Voiding was characterized using optical metallographic techniques. The fundamental conclusion of the investigation is that process voiding can reduce the interconnect fatigue reliability but that void location, not void size or volume fraction, has the greatest influence on fatigue life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it