MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416879936 · doi:10.37665/jsmtyhyjs54922

Optical Connector Contamination/Scratches and Its Influence on Optical Signal Performance

2003· article· W4416879936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surface Mount Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHain Celestial (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCable glandOptical fiberOptical fiber cableCladding (metalworking)Insertion lossSIGNAL (programming language)Fiber optic splitterOptical powerBit error rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The thrust of the NEMI project on fiber optic signal performance was to develop fiber optics inspection criteria, which may support differing requirements based on application. The tests’ resulting data would provide OEMs incoming quality and cable suppliers with specific cleanliness requirements with supporting data. Potentially, the inspection criteria could be used as an enhancement to existing TIA, Telcordia and other standards bodies. The influence of the contamination/scratches on connector optical performance, performance being insertion loss (IL) and return loss (RL), as well as on the system level performance using the bit error rate test (BERT), was investigated. It was shown that the effect of contamination/scratches on optical signal performance is dependant on the contamination type (fingerprints, carbon, metallic particles, etc.), the size of the contamination/scratches, and their location on the connector end face. The influence of the contamination/scratches becomes more evident if they are located in the core/cladding areas. It was shown that particle contamination may cause a significant increase in IL (up to ten times), decrease in RL (up to 3 times), and increase in BERT results (2-10 times). The significant degradation in BER performance occurred when the core of the fiber was blocked. The BER signal increased by more than 100 times compared with a clean fiber at average power -12 dBm. Scratches applied to the fiber MFD (mode field diameter) resulted in an increase of up to 25% of RL, while scratches located in the cladding layer showed little effect on IL, RL, and the BERT results. Multiple heavy scratches passing through the core caused severe performance degradation (IL, RL) and catastrophic BERT failures. Further investigations, such as mathematical modeling, are required to understand the influence of contamination/scratches on optical signal performance. The other objective of the project was to determine methods for improving the cleaning process and preventing recontamination of fiber optic connectors. This would result in the minimization of inspection and cleaning processes, elimination of false failures during test due to contaminated connectors, reduced cycle times, and associated cost reductions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it