MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417024252 · doi:10.1080/14664208.2025.2592367

GenAI-empowered teachers as active actors of change in developing (inter)national human capital in Singapore

2025· article· en· W4417024252 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Siew Kheng Chua, Kashif Raza, Ee-Lon Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Issues in Language Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in Asia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman capitalDeveloping countryHuman resourcesCapital (architecture)Higher education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) within education technology (EDTech) aims to transform Singapore into a global hub for GenAI by 2030. This means that schools, including postsecondary and higher institutions, must support this shift, and teachers must become key facilitators in transferring these new experiences to their students. Using Bourdieu’s Capital Theory, this chapter article discusses how the shift towards GenAI-infused teaching will revolutionise the education landscape, particularly in the teaching and learning of English, and improve enhance Singapore’s human capital, including international students living in Singapore, at the macro level. However, given the varying levels of English-language competency among students from different socioeconomic backgrounds and countries, this shift could lead to more significant social inequalities and stratification, as GenAI could act as both a leveller and a limiter. This paper article highlights that while GenAI empowers the education landscape and becomes a ‘non-human’ actor in this transformative journey, AI-empowered teachers become critical for effective language acquisition, as traditional teaching ensures not only personalised learning and a contextualised understanding of English but also acts as a social leveller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Issues in Language PlanningSame topicSocioeconomic Development in AsiaFrench-language works237,207