MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417063059 · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.109026

Multiclass prediction of Alzheimer’s disease using balanced multimodal data and deep ensemble learning

2025· article· en· W4417063059 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Signal Processing and Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsEnsemble learningDeep learningEnsemble forecastingPattern recognition (psychology)Multiclass classificationClass (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Discerning Alzheimer disease (AD) in its early stages, before the clinical symptoms, can help mitigate its progression and slow down the brain tissue damage through appropriate treatment. In this regard, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system can be useful in the neurologist toolbox, as it may help make a timely diagnosis and optimize the treatment of Alzheimer’s patients. Over the past decade, researchers have vested a lot of efforts on deep learning (DL) techniques for AD diagnosis, but few contributions have exploited the benefit of ensemble classification (EC) in DL. Despite the advances, the scientific community is still looking for reliable and robust approaches to identify early stages of AD. The paper aims to propose a complete CAD system that takes into account heterogeneous and unbalanced datasets to generate a robust classifier of AD stages. An original approach is presented at the end of the deep ensemble cooperation to predict AD and which allows managing the effect of class imbalance. Well-known convolutional neural network models (CNNs) are used as feature extractors with evolutionary-based hyper-parametric optimization to find the adequate architecture and enhanced momentum based optimizer to compile the CNNs. EC techniques are used as classifiers to reduce the probability of selecting a bad classifier among the basic models using an original weighted probability criterion. The ensemble classifiers integrated an original resampling strategy to rebalance the distribution of classes which enhanced performance of the minority class. The efficiency of the CAD system is evaluated on multimodal fusion data from the public OASIS and ADNI datasets, using 5-fold cross validation and nine confusion matrix-based metrics. The obtained success rate is encouraging when compared with state-of-the-art machine learning models, with all the implemented deep EC models showing acceptable performance. The experience has shown sensitivity rates of (94.05, 82.1, 96) % for Healthy control (HC), Mild cognitive impairment and AD stages of ADNI dataset, and (97.35, 85.35, 90.05, 93.92, 94.4) % for HC, Very mild and Mild impairment as well as Moderate and Severe dementia stages of OASIS dataset. Overall accuracy rates of (95, 99.1) % and (94.7, 98.2) % are obtained for multi-class and binary classification of ADNI and OASIS datasets respectively. The performance results of the test data are more precise and reliable and are superior than most of the reviewed state-of-the-art works. Moreover, the CAD system maintains good performance using an external ABIL dataset with an accuracy of 97.02% which reflect a generalization capability of the proposed approach justifying its adoption in real-world clinical contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it