MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417063059 · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.109026

Multiclass prediction of Alzheimer’s disease using balanced multimodal data and deep ensemble learning

2025· article· en· W4417063059 on OpenAlexafffund
Lilia Lazli, Farida Chériet, Mounir Boukadoum

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Signal Processing and Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsEnsemble learningDeep learningEnsemble forecastingPattern recognition (psychology)Multiclass classificationClass (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Discerning Alzheimer disease (AD) in its early stages, before the clinical symptoms, can help mitigate its progression and slow down the brain tissue damage through appropriate treatment. In this regard, a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system can be useful in the neurologist toolbox, as it may help make a timely diagnosis and optimize the treatment of Alzheimer’s patients. Over the past decade, researchers have vested a lot of efforts on deep learning (DL) techniques for AD diagnosis, but few contributions have exploited the benefit of ensemble classification (EC) in DL. Despite the advances, the scientific community is still looking for reliable and robust approaches to identify early stages of AD. The paper aims to propose a complete CAD system that takes into account heterogeneous and unbalanced datasets to generate a robust classifier of AD stages. An original approach is presented at the end of the deep ensemble cooperation to predict AD and which allows managing the effect of class imbalance. Well-known convolutional neural network models (CNNs) are used as feature extractors with evolutionary-based hyper-parametric optimization to find the adequate architecture and enhanced momentum based optimizer to compile the CNNs. EC techniques are used as classifiers to reduce the probability of selecting a bad classifier among the basic models using an original weighted probability criterion. The ensemble classifiers integrated an original resampling strategy to rebalance the distribution of classes which enhanced performance of the minority class. The efficiency of the CAD system is evaluated on multimodal fusion data from the public OASIS and ADNI datasets, using 5-fold cross validation and nine confusion matrix-based metrics. The obtained success rate is encouraging when compared with state-of-the-art machine learning models, with all the implemented deep EC models showing acceptable performance. The experience has shown sensitivity rates of (94.05, 82.1, 96) % for Healthy control (HC), Mild cognitive impairment and AD stages of ADNI dataset, and (97.35, 85.35, 90.05, 93.92, 94.4) % for HC, Very mild and Mild impairment as well as Moderate and Severe dementia stages of OASIS dataset. Overall accuracy rates of (95, 99.1) % and (94.7, 98.2) % are obtained for multi-class and binary classification of ADNI and OASIS datasets respectively. The performance results of the test data are more precise and reliable and are superior than most of the reviewed state-of-the-art works. Moreover, the CAD system maintains good performance using an external ABIL dataset with an accuracy of 97.02% which reflect a generalization capability of the proposed approach justifying its adoption in real-world clinical contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Signal Processing and ControlSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207