MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417105962 · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2025.10.009

Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relaxation: Mpemba and related effects

2025· article· en· W4417105962 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gianluca Teza, John Bechhoefer, Antonio Lasanta, Oren Raz, Marija Vucelja

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIslamic Scholarship FundEuropean Regional Development FundConsejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresas y Universidad, Junta de AndalucíaMinerva FoundationEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesWeizmann Institute of ScienceJunta de AndalucíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsRelaxation (psychology)ThermalKinetic energyHomogeneousStatistical mechanicsInverseVariety (cybernetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of our intuition about the behavior of physical systems is shaped by observations at or near thermal equilibrium. However, even a basic phenomenon such as a thermalquench can lead to states far from thermal equilibrium, where counterintuitive,anomalous effects can occur. A prime example of anomalous thermal relaxation is the Mpemba effect, in which a system prepared at a hot temperature cools down to the temperature of the cold environment faster than an identical system prepared at a warm temperature. Although originally reported for water more than 2000 years ago by Aristotle, the recent observation of analogous relaxation speedups in a variety of systems has motivated the search for generic explanations from the point of view of nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. Here, we review anomalous relaxation effects, which all share a nonmonotonic dependence of relaxation time versus initial “distance” from the final state or from the phase transition. We review the early water experiments and classify the zoology of anomalous relaxation phenomena related to the Mpemba effect. We then introduce general concepts and provide a modern definition of the effect, focusing on the theoretical frameworks of stochastic thermodynamics, kinetic theory, Markovian dynamics, and phase transitions. We discuss the recent experimental and numerical developments that followed these theoretical advances. These developments paved the way for the prediction and observation of novel phenomena, such as the inverse Mpemba effect. The review is self-contained and introduces anomalous relaxation phenomena in single- and many-body systems, both classical and quantum. We also discuss the broader relevance of the Mpemba effect, including its relation with equilibrium and dynamical phase transitions and its experimental implications. We end with perspectives that connect anomalous speedups to new ideas for designing optimal heating/cooling protocols, heat engines, and efficient samplers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics ReportsSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207