MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417115620 · doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.5c00347

Experimental Validation of Free-Base Porphyrin Derivatives as Antifungal Agents against <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>

2025· article· en· W4417115620 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyed Mehrzad Sajjadinezhad, Zachary Goudreau, Maria Rocio Gonzalez-Lamothe, Benoît Habermeyer, Peter Moffett, Kamal Bouarab, Pierre D. Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Agricultural Science & Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsAntifungalPorphyrinIdentification (biology)Drug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Free-base porphyrin derivatives act as photosensitizers to form singlet oxygen, 1 O 2, a reactive oxygen species type II, and as such, they can act as antimicrobial agents. We report on an assessment of several neutral and ionic free-base porphyrin derivatives as potential antifungal agents by testing their effects on the crop pathogen Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea), both in vitro and in vivo . The free-base ionic porphyrins tested impeded the growth of B. cinerea significantly in the 5–30 ppm concentration range when exposed to light but not under dark conditions. This response is consistent with a mechanism involving the photosensitization of 1 O 2 (g), which was confirmed by an observed phosphorescence signal at 1275 nm. Among the free-base porphyrins screened, charged molecules were particularly effective, a property that is associated with their enhanced ability to interact with fungal spores. Interestingly, ionic porphyrins were found to be efficient against various strains of B. cinerea, including those that are resistant to common fungicides, which are routinely used in agriculture. As such, our findings suggest that ionic free-base porphyrin photosensitizers serve as effective and sustainable alternatives to conventional fungicides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Agricultural Science & TechnologySame topicFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFrench-language works237,207