Learning image derived PDE-phenotypes from fMRI data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partial differential equations (PDEs) model various physical phenomena, such as electromagnetic fields and fluid mechanics. Methods such as sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) and PDE-Net 2.0 have been developed to identify and model PDEs on the basis of data via sparse optimization and deep neural networks, respectively. While PDE models are less commonly applied to fMRI data, they have the potential to uncover hidden connections and essential components in brain activity. Using the ADHD200 dataset, we applied canonical independent component analysis (CanICA) and uniform manifold approximation (UMAP) for dimensionality reduction of fMRI data. We then used sparse ridge regression to identify PDEs from the reduced data, and applied significant PDE features for classification achieving high accuracy in distinguishing individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study demonstrates a novel approach for extracting meaningful features from fMRI data for neurological disorder analysis to understand the role of oxygen transport (delivery & consumption) in the brain during neural activity, which is relevant for studying intracranial pathologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".