MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417155087 · doi:10.33395/jmp.v14i2.15690

Data Mining Untuk Memprediksi Penjualan

2025· article· W4417155087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Minfo Polgan · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaive Bayes classifierInformatics engineeringPattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendekatan yang digunakan pada paper ini ialah metode Naive Bayes Classifier. Metode ini bekerja dalam himpunana data kemudian di ekstrak menjadi pengetahuan baru yang akan digunakan untuk optimasi strategi pemasaran. Algoritma Naive Bayes Classifier juga bekerja dalam tipe data numerik yang dapat memudahkan dalam proses analisa. Proses pada metode ini yaitu proses analisa pola data penjualan yang telah ada sebelumnya (Learning Phase) berdasarkan atribut-atribut yaitu jenis, waktu, ukuran yang di ujikan dan proses dari analisa. Penelitian ini menghasilkan pengetahuan baru. Selain hal tersebut dari proses analisa dengan metode Naive Bayes Classifier yaitu menghasilkan pola penjualan berdasarkan atribut-atribut yang telah di tentukan. Hasil dari proses analisa ini akan di gunakan untuk kepentingan perusahan dalam upaya optimasi strategi pemasaran. Pengetahuan baru ini juga dapat memberikan informasi penting seperti hasil prediksi minat pembeli yang dapat digunakan dalam efektivitas dan efisiensi pemasaran dan peningkatan penjualan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it