MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417167598 · doi:10.1108/dl-02-2021-0008

Shifting to Online Instruction in the Epicenter of a U.S. Pandemic

2021· article· en· W4417167598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDistance Learning · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakChinaQuarter (Canadian coin)Epicenter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New York City became the epicenter of the coronavirus within the United States. Over the span of just a few weeks, we went from zero cases to one case, to having our intensive care units overrun with thousands of people in need of life support, to the military setting up makeshift hospitals in our main convention center, tents set up in the middle of Central Park, and a Naval hospital on the Hudson River.It was early March 2020 when news of a novel coronavirus began to dominate news stories across the United States. We had heard about a virus spreading rapidly across China and Europe. In past years fears of other viruses such as SARS, swine flu, and Ebola had caused false alarm that led to my belief that the U.S. would have safeguards in place to ensure that the coronavirus would not reach our country. However, when news of the virus, causing extreme loss of life in Italy, began to surface, I became concerned.I am an adjunct professor at a university in Queens, New York, and a group of my students from the semester prior had shared their planning and excitement anticipating their once in a lifetime opportunity to study abroad during the spring 2020 semester in Italy. Before class, we would discuss their hopes and fears and the financial burden placed on their families. Once I realized my former students might have been at risk of contracting the virus, I emailed the group to check in and confirm they were safe and well. The students responded immediately to inform me that the university had decided it was best that they return to the states, complete the rest of the semester online, and choose to quarantine in their homes for at least 14 days. I was relieved to learn that my students were at home reunited with their families until just before the end of our initial communication. They shared that although the media had been reporting a series of screening procedures at American airports, they were not screened to leave Italy or return to the United States. They explained that there was a very low risk any students could be infected because the region they were living in had no reported cases. Even though these students assured me that they were well, a feeling of panic began to set in.A first report of a woman who had recently traveled outside the United States and resided in New York City emerged. Soon after, a lawyer working in Midtown Manhattan who had not left his hometown or the city was reported as infected with the possibility of having spread the virus to hundreds of others. At first, my understanding of this virus led me to believe that only the elderly or immune-compromised could be infected, but within 1 day, I learned that no one was safe. This vicious virus could be contracted by the young and old, as well as the sick or healthy.On March 6, the university sent out an email to faculty notifying them of a “contingency plan,” which included a trial run of online classes on March 10th and 11th. Faculty were asked to test their ability to navigate online teaching resources and conduct either synchronous or asynchronous instruction. At this time, I was confident that the test run was strictly precautionary, and I believed face-to-face classes would resume the following week. Students and faculty were told to expect either short-term (14 days) or long-term disruption (14+ days). However, March 9 ended up being our last face-to-face class, even though that was not completely certain at the time. The entire class was present that day, and they appeared to be concerned. The conversations kept coming back to “do you really think this is going to happen?” I felt as if my role as a professor shifted to the role of a parent, trying to comfort them by saying “everything is going to be okay” and making all these promises while knowing inside that I had no experience with online teaching. I was trying to comfort them, but I had no idea what was really going to happen.Once the news that my state could potentially be the epicenter of the pandemic began to spread, the panic of creating an emergency response plan for online instruction set in. The university sent emails saying they would support the faculty, but it was clear they shared the same uncertainty. Department heads asked all faculty to navigate online resources as a way to troubleshoot any issues that could arise while our information technology department was still available. I was confident that I would be able to provide instruction remotely after I had learned how to locate and utilize online teaching and feedback tools available on Blackboard and during a few over-the-phone coaching sessions with a member of our information technology department. The university made swift decisions to fully transition to online learning the week of March 16, 2020. To my surprise, within days, most U.S. universities, including my own, chose to transition to fully online instruction for the remainder of the semester.In what follows, I share the story of teaching in the U.S. epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic. First, I share my initial plan to successfully provide online instruction and avoid anticipated barriers that may have occurred. Next, I detail student reactions to my intervention strategies and my observations related to student performance during extended online instruction. I also describe barriers to student success, such as developing feelings of anxiety and contracting the illness, as well as working through my own COVID-19 infection. Finally, I explain how I determined the end of term grades while staying true to my personal vow to maintain a fair stance toward grading during this unprecedented time. Within each of these sections, I describe my journey: my initial plan and what actually happened, including roadblocks, my internal struggles, and what the outcome was. I conclude by reflecting on key themes from this unexpected journey and offering questions for readers to ponder as we move forward in a year where higher education institutions will continue to grapple with COVID-19.The first day of our switch to online classes was the day student midterm presentations were scheduled. That meant that I was responsible for organizing the order of presentations, evaluating student work, and offering feedback. I was also responsible for ensuring that all students could participate remotely.My response to transitioning to online learning was simple: I decided that scheduling a synchronized class would work best for all because it was the most similar to face-to-face instruction. I was confident that each student would be able to present their midterm projects and would be able to receive immediate verbal feedback from both myself and their peers. Prior to class, I created a secure Zoom account and scheduled a class meeting, which only allowed access to students enrolled in my course. I asked that students check their connections and the ability to sign in before class began. In order to prevent any issues with communication or Wi–Fi, I divided the class time into three 1-hour time slots and allowed students the opportunity to select the time slot that worked best for them. I hoped that including the option of choice and having the ability to coordinate their selection with friends would students to participate and any anxiety they may have been all to and I was of best as an is anticipating that may with instruction. Before the for online I to avoid and I believed that I would be able to online learning anxiety by transitioning to synchronous class issues arise during the first synchronous though the class was divided into who were asked to sign in during a time slot and test their ability to access our online before class students students could not on their first few were after on and and either or loss of students appeared to have with either present or to each the initial online students made to how it was to learn students for or to be or to in They explained that even though our class was which most it not the same comfort as face-to-face and issues led to communication our first synchronous class, students their midterm projects to a group of their peers. Even the students that appeared to have their presentations were or their when they if a caused a to the student would and for the to resume or the if was clear before their students to their place or a to their and think about what they to appeared to through the information they were to it who were not their in order to any this it may have with to in class where students and after each during face-to-face instruction. this synchronous online class, I was to the role to feedback and after each because there was led me to believe that there was an in their of their role in an online of most were to be on or I had a of to a that and students to and on shared for their That was in a to the online I a of class time to teaching students how to their midterm I shared my own and for and with peers. the day of our first online class, students a of the work they to present during our first synchronous presentations I that there could potentially be issues with technology and assured students that I confident that they could successfully present their The to both the and the had been during face-to-face class time, and I chose to students of the they at the of the online I hoped that the would as a to them plan for their of the following was as 1 toward the midterm in the issues were anticipated and Students issues with and appeared to or to in an online At students were during presentations, and were to questions or participate in a I not was the I when I to midterm projects knowing students may not have been able to to their the of online with internal and myself and as I to the I online for working at institutions of higher learning and the of that it is only to be when it was to maintain the same as if the pandemic not We were all and working during unprecedented no one what the was clear that my to grading this first would my grading decisions I to a choice and with as I could to be I that I could by my However, during a I believed that being or making just decisions included having for students who were to learn online when it was not what they up order to the midterm and with I decided to the grading for the of the midterm and to each student for their online I believed that students would that there still a set of with within the However, in cases where may have their I chose to be fair and following the first trial class, the university I work in the decided it was in the best of all to transition to online learning series of emails from the of the university and began to my were all to a clear and to be of our Faculty were asked to such as and access to technology and We were also to work with students that may be with personal related to I was that may with but I was to students to ensure they were in my began to conduct to locate that could best for online the I strategies from and of best with a I chose to immediately the following strategies to the of my online chose to the first few of synchronous class time to a and online I asked questions and students to in I also this time as an opportunity to students that I was to making myself available for student support during and after Students were to me at any time and our class the week of online I that each student select a to provide I students to and utilize tools such as and other communication to share and them on and that as role in student in of information by students to and in the online during synchronous class time, I to provide students with feedback after was which meant that my of their work would be sent within the university that faculty be of and with I chose to with and email students to my to be with and the to the time also a of my time each day to out to students of and my to for that need order to I to by and to each class and were a at the of each The was also to my students to access the for or to for strategies I chose to were to my I began to receive and with questions or for to projects or Even though most of the students appeared to be to the online a group of students began to class or during synchronous the of each synchronous I would each student as they on and made a of students that were not one of the first online one student that they were told was no and not be for the remainder of the that class, I all of the emails that were related to the pandemic or was no that I or of the students not in there were only to work with students and their during this and unprecedented the following class, I chose to the with a of my I students that I need to of who class to ensure and of university would continue to the remainder of the my for a few students chose to me to explain that their were and I my support in these including sessions and for the time the week of online instruction of my students me to share that they were and had for response was if and that we will work when you to ensure you will be in the the end of that my own began to experience of the COVID-19 chose to in our I was left to care for our home and on my Within I began to from and At first, I chose to these it be the of working on a or in a Before I I had a and could my and was and within I a and of I was able to rest for an extended because my during a and I was able to resume instruction a for the of the it not my ability to continue synchronous instruction or support was my to provide immediate feedback on work were into online instruction when the to last was The students enrolled in my were education and their that they a plan with of face-to-face and synchronous online instruction was to teaching students how to a and provide a for their decisions in learning In a of best to my online instruction had been to support student Students were to work with and were to sessions to receive coaching and immediate feedback on students were of my to their and my to if I began to I chose to the decisions I made when grading the I was determined to I chose to the for this as a for grading and was to and that student most were to and included a for decisions with However, there to be a of or across within the same I that the instruction on how to these sections, as well as a of were during class time and available to students to synchronous sessions on the class I myself to a fair or just in my to I about the students who were not and not synchronous classes or I they of the it is their I a time to that not class and chose to of these students work, but not all made the same that were with the I had I began to what the fair or just be for this be I I would need to my to grading each for who chose to participate in synchronous classes or I on my when grading and my of being fair and when grading student during the pandemic. The was I chose to the for this to the grading of most but chose not to for student that I had as a in certain for this was that my including and have been I chose to for student and sessions to students who appeared to to these is to that of the students sessions to clear up all and students their to last and I and their work, it was clear that my first to ensure all students learn and was not completely most students class, and me when they support, a group of students to I to and set out to locate strategies or to immediately to support my and up into the and to and strategies I had not about up to this was not before I a by a related to best for teaching In his and The and for teaching the best for teaching that the following to the of online of and teaching I realized that I had of the strategies they I had created a online by and offering to be available to support students outside of our scheduled class time. In I set by developing and learning to and allowed students to or group sessions or the option of working I that each class included synchronous instruction and asynchronous such as and to participate in to share and on Students were also able to access resources in and available on our such as students how time they be for and planning a or for the were I had not this I was to any and all strategies to ensure my students were I describe how I chose to these feedback and have me on and the of my instruction. Before the transition to online I tools such as to feedback from I have also at the end of each face-to-face class to the of understanding and inform my planning However, during the first of online I to utilize the tools to feedback. I had to synchronous and sessions were by a group of students and made it to any information from with began to utilize tools such as and to support student I created a a to student feedback. This feedback my ability to class time, present and maintain a when I also the questions to learn about related to the of certain and to what they and not about our online were also as a to feedback related to the of my instruction and to me students in need of I created a and asked students to complete and it after each a way to student and I asked students to complete it during class time. I assured students that this would not be and would be to plan instruction. a of students enrolled in my chose to utilize these and I them when instruction and that in feeling and believed they were of these I felt it was my to them I was in my to teaching and grading and chose to to with students before or after class or during a time they could and complete their best these I shared and each to them a to complete past before the This appeared to be the most in students back on I and to choose a or for the I immediately this to In of reflecting in an I believe it is to to by to the or for or the as a of until the class to a or I began to up each class by students to the at the of class and on their or I each by students to I that I a few am I of that I just as time students responded to this and were able to their or need for was also on the day of the I began class by the that were shared on the first day of the I a to students they the for this students were and appeared to be with their performance unexpected and strategies with best for online instruction had been in my there were a few or barriers that may have with student during the week of this time students began to share feelings of and a of students class, not and not to my to the week of synchronous class students appeared to be They were in for class and in conversations with to share their and feelings of They feeling and to the news and being to their They shared the issues they were in other such as a transition to online instruction as a to and an to to questions and became clear that the students were an and were not to the strategies had been to support students that class, there was no I could locate in the to with students that chose to class, not or to to the made to them. students that were present during face-to-face classes and of the first synchronous sessions students were still enrolled in the and their were included on my but I was to them or email until the last few of the student chose to to my email the day before the to explain that work and left time to class and to complete the In this case, I on my to be and in my to teaching. I assured the student that I was confident in ability to complete the and it before my grades were in. chose to my and was able to the work and the other student decided to me a of on the day after the was feelings of for the to support However, shared that the chose to of the option this semester by the the for the was still able to the In this case, I to or not there were strategies that I could have to this student to complete the I not any resources that me with any but I will continue to if this projects were and end of term grades were in I and grading projects and to each online until this in time, grades for students in my had not been for each were up and with a Once the of grading had me and how to the best the and the fair in of grading at the of the pandemic included being and This meant I would be and just when grading but would also the and students were to work through during this time. the of living and working during a I to choose an or that could be when trying to a I the by each student and to it with the I was most grades appeared to with a I could have on student there were students that were 1 to the they The only grading left to in was chose to the grading for the course. to the created before the of the in class as well as an role during class students a class either face-to-face or online, were questions and in during all class sessions and were to out support by group I asked students were not being for online classes or to for any because of the students that an of and to in any be I just in my ability to in conversations with students and had their to feedback. I believed that in order to be fair and have I have a understanding of student of the grading The the fair was to with students to I decided to students to and the as a I that all students and Once the grades were into the toward end of semester I grades for students to and that they me if they had any or believed the was In the no students were in and I was confident that this the I had during the was the most story of my journey teaching through a pandemic is because it to the that were shared by thousands of students and and working at all the I on this time both and I that I have in my ability to through my and I was able to support my students and in order to barriers that may have with teaching and a week of transitioning to online it was clear that and for students would as the of my own best during a pandemic. meant creating online learning that the face-to-face instruction in I set chose to and created for students to in learning by working in with and in for students was also through my to available and online student in need of support was able to me to and Students to share how it was to they could on their professor to be there when they living and working through a myself a and teaching during a pandemic been a time when I have a of time to learn about best Prior to the of I had not teaching online and not have any in instruction that may have me support I began to issues that from rapidly transitioning to online my response was I chose to in to to barriers that with my ability to provide instruction. resources to support online instruction were available at my I am confident that my to of the strategies I learned about be for ensuring my most learned through my experience teaching during a pandemic may be that grading students to with This that to to their feelings or the they may be living or working I believe that when it to it be or teaching face-to-face or online, in New York City or any other across the it may be for all to what it to and their best to be when making decisions related to there to be about what expect their classes to in the coming of what the will may or not face-to-face We have heard a with face-to-face and with up students in classes may be in is also the possibility of all online instruction. questions about how will students not sign up for online which secure and The only that is certain is uncertainty. we is move forward with the learned in these last few and with a to continue our students with

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it