MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417179102 · doi:10.1002/sd.70521

Economic Determinants of Renewable Energy Consumption in China: Integrating Green Infrastructure, Urban Agglomeration, and Environmental Stressors

2025· article· en· W4417179102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersHezhou University
KeywordsRenewable energySustainable developmentGreenhouse gasEnergy policyEnergy consumptionEnvironmental pollutionEnergy developmentEnvironmental impact of the energy industryClimate change mitigation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT China's rapid economic growth has intensified pressure on its energy system, with persistent fossil fuel dependence driving severe air pollution and escalating carbon emissions. Accelerating the transition toward renewable energy is thus vital for achieving the nation's “dual carbon” goals. This study investigates the structural and environmental determinants of renewable energy consumption (REC) in China from 2005 to 2023 using a multi‐method econometric framework. By integrating green infrastructure (forest area), energy efficiency (energy intensity), environmental stressors (PM 2.5 exposure), and spatial dynamics (urban agglomerations exceeding one million inhabitants), the analysis offers a comprehensive understanding of renewable energy drivers. Employing the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds approach, Dynamic OLS (DOLS) for long‐run robustness, and Toda–Yamamoto causality tests for directionality, the results confirm strong long‐run cointegration between REC and its determinants. Forest cover, urban agglomerations, and PM 2.5 exposure significantly influence renewable energy demand, while energy intensity reflects structural breaks aligned with policy reforms in the late 2000s. These findings highlight that renewable energy uptake in China is shaped by the interplay of ecological resilience, urban transformation, and environmental pressures. The study contributes to sustainable development research by emphasizing that renewable energy policy must be integrated with ecological management, urban planning, and pollution control. Policy recommendations advocate for afforestation, renewable‐integrated urban infrastructure, stricter emission regulation, and ongoing efficiency improvements to accelerate China's clean energy transition and inform broader sustainable development pathways in emerging economies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it