MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1983 Prevalence, Etiology, and Outcomes of Microscopic Colitis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4417197906 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphocytic colitisMicroscopic colitisEtiologyCollagenous colitisRetrospective cohort studyColonoscopyColitisLamina propria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Microscopic Colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the colon that commonly presents with non-bloody watery diarrhea, weight loss, and nocturnal stools. It has a high prevalence in older females affecting 1 in 115 women during their lifetime. The exact etiology of MC is not well understood but it is believed to involve a combination of genetic, environmental, and immune factors. Endoscopically, it presents with normal-appearing colonic mucosa, although erythema with or without edema may also be observed. However, the diagnosis is made on colon biopsies. There are 2 subtypes of MC, lymphocytic colitis (LC) which consists of lymphocytic inflammation of the lamina propria, and intraepithelial lymphocytosis, or collagenous colitis (CC) which consists of subepithelial collagen band thickening. We aim to create a database of patients in Manitoba with MC based on histological diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective review of pathology reports of patients undergoing a colonoscopy from 2006-2018 within the Winnipeg health region. Results: 914 patients (9.7%) were identified with MC from the initial 9377 pathology reports that were screened. 490 (53.6%) patients had CC, of whom 79 (16.1%) were males and 411 (83.8%) were females. The mean age at diagnosis was 62.9 ± 12.4 years old (range 28-90) for males and 61.8 ± 13.3 years old (range 20-91) for females. In contrast, 409 (44.7%) patients had LC, of whom 94 (22.9%) were males and 315 (77.0%) were females. The mean age at diagnosis of LC was 61.9 ± 17.2 years old (range 23-90) for males and 59.2 ± 13.7 years old (range 18-91) for females. Fifteen (1.6%) patients had an unspecified diagnosis on their pathology report. Seventy-four people had more than one colonoscopy during the study period. Finally, there was a signal of an increase in the incidence of both subtypes in recent years. In males, there was a trend towards a higher incidence of LC (R² = 0.60) in recent years vs a higher incidence of CC in females (R² = 0.82). Initial data shows that 31.1% used a PPI (most commonly omeprazole) and 23.8% were on a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI). 1.4% had celiac disease and 1.9% had a proceeding CDI pre-MC diagnosis compared to 2.7% post. Conclusion: There was a strong female predominance, albeit comparable age at diagnosis, in both MC subtypes with a trend towards increased incidence in recent years. A higher prevalence of CC was noted especially in middle-aged years. Finally, there was a high correlation between PPI and SSRI use and new cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it