MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417201663 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3642325

LLM-Guided Distributed Model Predictive Control for Decentralized UAV Formations

2025· article· W4417201663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilitySwarm behaviourDroneController (irrigation)AdaptabilityModel predictive controlTestbedDecentralised system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time autonomous control of decentralized drone swarms in dynamic and cluttered environments remains a significant challenge. This paper presents a natural language-driven framework that integrates a fine-tuned large language model (LLM) with distributed model predictive control (MPC) to enable scalable and responsive UAV swarm autonomy. The system architecture comprises a ground control unit, an intelligent mission planning agent, and a decentralized swarm of drones. Mission objectives and target coordinates supplied by external sources (e.g., satellites, command center or airborne platforms), are processed by fine-tuned Phi-2 LLM trained on over 200,000 command variations. The LLM interprets these natural language inputs into structured mission plans, including drone assignments, formations, and operational modes (e.g., swarm-based, multi-target, or single-agent deployments). These plans are dispatched via the Agent mission allocator to the UAVs, each of which leverages a local MPC controller to execute its assigned task. The controllers dynamically optimize flight trajectories while ensuring collision avoidance, formation maintenance, and seamless role transitions. The framework is validated in a high-fidelity simulation environment that combines the ROTORS quadrotor dynamics simulator with Unreal Engine’s photorealistic and depth-aware rendering, facilitating vision-based navigation in cluttered environments. Experimental results demonstrate high mission success rates, accurate formation tracking, and robust adaptability to mid-mission updates, affirming the potential of combining LLM-driven intent parsing with decentralized MPC for intuitive, safe, and scalable swarm control. Future work will focus on extending this framework to physical UAV platforms for real-world deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it