Hybrid Neural/Traditional OFDM Receiver with Learnable Decider
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) methods have emerged as promising solutions for enhancing receiver performance in wireless orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems, offering significant improvements over traditional estimation and detection techniques. However, DL-based receivers often face challenges such as poor generalization to unseen channel conditions and difficulty in effectively tracking rapid channel fluctuations. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a hybrid receiver architecture that integrates the strengths of both traditional and neural receivers. The core innovation is a discriminator neural network trained to dynamically select the optimal receiver whether it is the traditional or DL-based receiver according on the received OFDM block characteristics. This discriminator is trained using labeled pilot signals that encode the comparative performance of both receivers. By including anomalous channel scenarios in training, the proposed hybrid receiver achieves robust performance, effectively overcoming the generalization issues inherent in standalone DL approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it