MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417303575 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-30471-x

Novel structures of chaos-based parallel multiple image encryption and FPGA implementation

2025· article· en· W4417303575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersTrường Đại học Bách Khoa Hà Nội
KeywordsEncryptionProbabilistic encryptionDisk encryption theoryMultiple encryptionCiphertextImage (mathematics)Deterministic encryptionDisk encryption hardwareCryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image data has been generated massively by devices in medical imaging modalities, cameras, and even by artificial intelligence. Encryption is the powerful method to keep the image content confidential, in which an encryption algorithm must include the confusion and diffusion properties. For massive images, a efficient method of encryption must be chosen to meet the demands of encryption speed and confidentiality. So far, chaos-based image encryption has been an active topic of research because it is considered an effective method to remove the correlation in image data as well as to keep confidential by the involvement of chaotic system in the encryption process. Besides, multiple image encryption algorithms encrypt multiple images in parallel, and it provides highly efficient performance in term of speed if it is implemented on a parallel computing platform such as multiple core processing as well as digital hardware design. Chaos-based multiple image encryption is constructed by integrating a chaotic system into multiple image encryption. Recently, many algorithms of chaos-based multiple image encryption have been proposed, and they are proved to have high efficient in terms of both speed and confidentiality. However, all the existing algorithms of chaos-based multiple image encryption require images of the same size and of the same number of bits representing pixels. Further, they encrypt a cohort of plain images at the same time, and all ciphertext images of a cohort must also be decrypted at the same time. It means that if it does not allow to decrypt one or some selected ciphertext images from a cohort separately; and as a result, it wastes time and energy to decrypt unwanted images. In this paper, three novel structures of chaos-based multiple image encryption are proposed which overcome the drawbacks of existing algorithms. That is, the proposed cryptosystems accept cohort images of different sizes; pixels of images can be represented by different numbers of bits; and any selected ciphertext images from a cohort can be decrypted separately. The security is improved by using the session keys of image-content dependency. The proposed structures of multiple image encryption consist of permutation, substitution, and diffusion processes. The difference between three structures is the order of such processes. A perturbed chaotic map and a linear-feedback shift register are employed to generate pseudo-random bit sequences for session keys. The simulation results for the exemplar designs using the proposed structures show the effectiveness by means of the statistical analysis for the session keys using the NIST randomness test, information entropy, histogram, and correlation coefficients of adjacent pixels in ciphertext images, and security analysis by means of space and sensitivity of the secret key. The hardware implementation on the FPGA platform demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed structures by means of throughput and hardware efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it