MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417347366 · doi:10.1093/biomethods/bpaf093

Point-of-care electroencephalography for prediction of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery: protocol for a prospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4417347366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology Methods and Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeliriumElectroencephalographyPerioperativeProspective cohort studyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCohort studyLogistic regressionCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a complication of surgery in older adults associated with adverse outcomes. Current screening methods demonstrate poor interrater reliability, and conventional electroencephalography (EEG)-based screening requires intensive setup. Point-of-care (POC) EEG technology offers a rapid and objective alternative that may capture neurophysiological signatures of delirium risk. When combined with baseline and perioperative variables, POC EEG may enable the prediction of POD before clinical manifestation. In this study, we aim to develop a POD prediction model using POC EEG as well as explore secondary outcomes such as longer-term cognitive impairment and postoperative pain. This is a prospective cohort study enrolling older adults (≥60 years) undergoing elective non-cranial inpatient surgery at two academic hospitals. The target cohort size is 150 participants, determined by an events-per-parameter approach. All participants undergo baseline cognitive testing and pain assessment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Numeric Rating Scale. The primary outcome is POD, while secondary outcomes include follow-up MoCA scores and postoperative pain scores. POD is assessed immediately after surgery and every 12 h during the admission with the 4AT tool. Perioperative EEG is acquired using the Ceribell EEG system (Ceribell, Inc.) across standardized preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. EEG features such as spectral power, alpha/delta ratio, and burst suppression ratio are analyzed in relation to outcomes. Predictive models will be developed using regularized logistic regression with nested feature sets, and model performance will be evaluated. This study evaluates whether POC EEG can accurately predict POD in older adults undergoing elective surgery, as well as longer-term cognitive impairment and postoperative pain. This approach could enable early identification of high-risk patients and facilitate targeted preventive strategies. By generating a validated risk model, multimodal exploratory analyses, and openly available datasets, this work aims to advance the practical management of perioperative outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it