The Architectural Economy of Reform: Commerce, Class, and the Newfoundland Hotel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Canada’s grand railway hotels are a celebrated building type. However, historians have paid little attention to the economic strictures of the hotel type in Canada, or to their role in inscribing networks of commerce and finance onto the North American landscape. This article proposes the Newfoundland Hotel as an exemplary case study to explore these networks. Born of a late nineteenth-century desire to diversify Newfoundland’s economy away from the fishery, the hotel later suffered insolvency and from the prerogatives of corporate investment interests. The building was also involved in a series of changes to the organisation of Newfoundland as a political state, which saw ownership of the hotel pass from private to public hands and elevated it from a provincial to a national concern. Designed by the preeminent Montreal firm of Ross and Macdonald in 1926, the Newfoundland Hotel attempted to consolidate a class-based vision of financial modernity in a resource-dependent economy. In discussing the hotel’s construction, use and demolition, this essay explores how a series of contestations over class, culture and nationhood were manifest in the project’s turbulent financial affairs. It highlights the need to study the financial history of buildings alongside their material and social features to understand more fully how economic pressures shape the valuation of buildings over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it