MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417408135 · doi:10.1080/1540496x.2025.2599441

Economic Policy Uncertainty and Matching in Venture Capital Markets: Evidence from China’s Venture Capital Market

2025· article· en· W4417408135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging Markets Finance and Trade · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenture capitalMatching (statistics)Social venture capitalCapital (architecture)Economic capital

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the influence of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on matching between venture capital institutions (VCs) and startups. Working on data from the venture capital sector in China between 2002 and 2021, our analysis reveals that EPU notably improves the matching level between VCs and startups. EPU has a stronger positive impact on matching for VCs deeply integrated into China’s economy and for mid-to-late-stage startups. We further show that EPU enhances matching by encouraging syndicated investments. Moreover, VCs’ risk-taking positively moderates the impact of EPU on matching. Lastly, EPU exerts a negative impact on VCs’ exit outcomes, but improved matching between VC firms and startups helps alleviate this impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it