MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417439110 · doi:10.1109/tse.2025.3645143

CARE: Context Aware Root Cause Identification Using Distributed Traces and Profiling Metrics

2025· article· W4417439110 on OpenAlexaff
Mahsa Panahandeh, Naser Ezzati Jivan, Abdelwahab Hamou‐Lhadj, James Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityBrock UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoot causeObservabilityRoot cause analysisProfiling (computer programming)Root (linguistics)Identification (biology)Benchmark (surveying)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Root cause localization in microservices is challenging due to intricate service dependencies and the high volume and heterogeneity of collected monitoring data, which add complexity to the analysis. Conventional methods often overlook nuanced propagation patterns and contextual interactions among services, and they are limited in leveraging multi-source observability data for comprehensive root cause identification. This study introduces CARE, a context-aware, spectrum-analysis-based approach that integrates multi-source observability data and employs network analysis to prioritize the contextual significance of components in propagating anomalies across individual services, service communities, and requests. CARE’s weighted spectrum analysis leverages these prioritized contexts to pinpoint underlying performance issues. Evaluations on 224 cases from the TrainTicket benchmark and a real-world Internet service provider’s production system demonstrate CARE’s substantial accuracy gains, with top-1 accuracy of 72%-89% and top-5 accuracy of 84%-99% for single root causes, outperforming baselines by 8%-41%. CARE also shows significant improvements in dual root cause identification, exceeding baseline performance by 18%-37%, all while maintaining efficient resource usage, establishing CARE as a robust and resource-effective solution for root cause localization in complex microservice environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Software EngineeringSame topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207