MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417520195 · doi:10.1007/s10898-025-01579-1

A kinematic smoothing method for tightening convex relaxations of ordinary differential equations

2025· article· en· W4417520195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Optimization · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsOdeOrdinary differential equationRegular polygonSmoothingKinematicsParametric statisticsRelaxation (psychology)Numerical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a new approach for constructing convex enclosures of reachable sets of parametric ordinary differential equations (ODEs), for use in deterministic methods for global dynamic optimization. In our new approach, we modify an established ODE relaxation framework by Scott and Barton (2013), using kinematic intuition to replace certain discontinuous transitions between discrete modes with tighter, smoother transitions, and ultimately producing tighter, smoother relaxations of the original ODE solution that are more amenable to integration by off-the-shelf numerical ODE solvers. We refer to our new relaxation approach as “kinematic smoothing”. Our new ODE relaxations are straightforward to construct automatically based on established tools, and we present several numerical examples based on a proof-of-concept implementation in Julia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it