MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W45458815

Towards a grid simulation platform for dynamical systems

2007· article· en· W45458815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingGridGrid computingAsynchronous communicationLatency (audio)Fault toleranceProcess (computing)Computer networkOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grid computing may offer the potential for compute intensive simulations of systems and processes such as those associated with Computational Fluid Dynamics and protein design. Such potential is arguably difficult to realize due to some challenging issues associated with distributed computing systems; including latency, asynchronous communication, and the ubiquity of faults. Various research efforts have been focused on developing grid architectures and mechanisms to minimize the effect of latency and improve the fault-tolerance of resource management systems. In this respect, this paper describes a grid simulation platform geared towards the minimization of the effect of latency through an integration of the domain decomposition approach to process simulation with a chosen neighborhood-based grid architecture. The operation of the proposed platform is illustrated through an experimental simulation of a two dimensional diffusion process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it