MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W52953477 · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2005.004

UV Spectrophotometry as a Non-parametric Measurement of Water and Wastewater Quality Variability

2005· article· en· W52953477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilutionNormalization (sociology)WastewaterEffluentContext (archaeology)Environmental scienceWater qualityParametric statisticsEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEnvironmental engineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The composition of water and wastewater, varying temporally and spatially, depends on factors such as environmental context, types of pollution sources, weather conditions leading to dilution or solids transportation, length of sewer network, etc. Because quantitative parameters are often not adapted for the characterization of wastewater quality variability, a non-parametric measurement is proposed, based on comparison of the UV absorption spectra of samples. The presence of isosbestic points, occurring in the set of spectra either directly or indirectly after normalization, allows quantification of the variability of a given water or effluent. A normalization step is used when dilution exists in the case of a mixture of water types (discharge or rain). Several examples show how to calculate the variability or to estimate the dilution factor from UV spectra data, even without results of physicochemical parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it