MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W55299528

The Case for In-School Monitoring.

2003· article· en· W55299528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation Canada · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommitImprisonmentPsychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyCriminology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anecdotal reports and academic literature have documented the positive impact of a caring adult on a child’s life. Developmental psychologists generally agree that all children need an adult in their lives who is crazy about them. Resiliency research has found that children who were able to cope despite difficult circumstances identified a single factor as most helpful: one significant adult in their lives, who showed and maintained a real interest in and connection with them. In family circumstances where the child does not have that one consistent, interested adult – whether that is due to death, divorce, imprisonment, or parents working many jobs – the resiliency and outcomes are not as positive. But, mentors can fill the gap. Informal mentors are adults – such as sports coaches, teachers, relatives or neighbours – who already have a place in a child’s life. Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) have formalized the mentor process to strategically provide mentors for children and youth who do not have such a significant, caring adult in their lives. In BBBS programs, mentors are adults who are unrelated to the child and who commit time to spend with the child each week, for at least a year. Independent research has demonstrated the positive impact of mentoring on the lives of children in areas such as academics, attitude, anti-social behaviour, decisionmaking, and relationships with peers, parents and other adults. The need for mentoring has never been so great. The Progress of Canada’s Children report states that the number of children under 12 years old whose parents were separated or divorced has tripled in the last 20 years; that children in sole-parent families are at greater risk of poor development than other children if the family is very poor or lives in an unsafe neighbourhood; and that the number of poor children grew from 1.36 million in 1995 to 1.5 million in 1996. Yet, for a variety of reasons (family responsibility, increased mobility, work commitments, etc.), the number of people who are willing or able to make the commitment to a community-based match is dropping. So, while we know that mentoring works, it has become more difficult to make the match that makes such a difference in a child’s life. In response to these two trends – increasing numbers of children who are in need coupled with a decreasing pool of volunteers – Big Brothers Big Sisters of Canada has launched a national In-School Mentoring program that allows local agencies to provide many more mentors to children. ISM is an activity-based program where the mentor and mentee meet on school property, during school hours, for one hour each week. Employers generally support the volunteer mentors in their volunteer work by releasing them from work for the volunteer time. Volunteer mentors are recruited, screened and trained by the agency; however, the children are selected by the teachers. Children who have low self-esteem, who may be at risk of dropping out of school, or who need extra attention may be identified as most likely to benefit from a one-to-one relationship. Often these children live in single-parent families and are highly transient, moving from home to home and school to school. Because children do better if they are matched at a younger age and when the match lasts for a longer period of time, some schools target children in grades 2 to 4. Typically, older children and youth tend to be more peer-focused and are somewhat reluctant to be involved in the ISM program; group mentoring programs seem to be more effective with that age group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it