A Security Community –“If You Can Keep It”: Demographic Change and the North American Zone of Peace
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Usually, scholarly research on security communities focuses on the conditions and the consequences of their forming; rare are the works that examine how and why these arrangements might decay and perhaps even disappear altogether. This is hardly a surprise, given that in certain fortunate parts of the world, public and elites alike have come to accept that interstate conflict, at least in their neighborhood, is a vestige of the past. No matter how haphazardly managed relations among them might be, the dominant expectation is that their security community is virtually indestructible -or to put it in the vernacular, "idiot-proof." This article critically examines that perspective. Specifically, it explores the potential impact of ethnic (including for the purposes of this project, religious) diasporas on continental security. The issue is framed from the point of view of the U.S. debate, not only because that debate has so many implications for the United States' northern and southern neighbors, Canada and Mexico, but also because in a real sense, it is those two neighbors who, for different reasons, are increasingly stylized in the U.S. as the source of the problem."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it