Contemporary landscapes of welfare: the ‘voluntary turn’?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book brings together a collection of new and innovative work by researchers from states where issues of voluntarism and participation have become increasingly important for the development and delivery of social welfare policy. The states include Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the US, and the UK. Those studies encompasses issues on the emergence of new political spaces in which the state and civil society are becoming hybridised, and within which voluntary organisations have become increasingly central to the implementation of policy and delivery of health and welfare services; the ways in which voluntary action can influence the nature of social, health and welfare services in particular places; and the importance of understanding the social, historical and political context within which landscapes of voluntarism emerge. The book focuses exclusively on developments in advanced capitalist welfare states where the voluntary sector has increasingly been viewed as a panacea for the problems of escalating demand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it