Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction, M. Partadario and R. Clark SEA IN A SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVE Making EIA Count in Decision-Making, R. Clark Strategic Sustainability Appraissal - One Way of Using SEA in the Move Toward Sustainability, M. Partadario and F. Moura PROCEDURAL APPROACHES TO SEA AT A POLICY LEVEL Toward a Legal Framework for SEA in Canada, S. Hazell and H. Benevides SEA Within the Government of Canada and Specifically Within the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, J. Shuttleworth and J. Howell SEA in the Czech Republic, M. D. Machac, V. Rimmel and L. Zenaty Evaluating Trade Agreements for Environmental Impacts: A Review and Analysis, W.E. Schramm Criteria for Evaluation of SEA, W. Thissen PROCEDURAL APPROACHES TO SEA AT A PLAN AND PROGRAM LEVEL SEA Experience in Development Assistance Using the Environmental Overview, S.L. Brown SEA of Parks Canada Management Plans, S.Therrien-Richards Environmental Assessment and Planning in South Africa: The SEA Connection, K. Wiseman METHODS AND APPLICATIONS - ROLE OF SEA IN DECISION-MAKING Strategic EA and Water Resource Planning in Europe, C. Brooke The Use of SEA and EIA in Decision-Making on Drinking Water Management and Production in the Netherlands, R. Verheem SEA of the Neiafu Master Plan, Vava'u, Tonga, R.K. Morgan and K.R. Onorio SEA of Water Management Plans and Programs: Lessons from California, R. Bass and A. Herson SEA in the Selection of Projects to Restore Louisiana's Coast, L. Wilson and A. Hamilton SEA: The Principles of Negotiation, the Disaggregative Decision-Making Method, and Parallel Organization in Regional Development, H. Tortto SEA: The Context for Ex-ante Public Participation in Transportation Planning: The Quebec Experience (Canada), P. Andre and J. Gagne FORUM The Future of SEA, R. Therivel and M.R. Partidario INDEX
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it