MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W579006457 · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5160

Oral history off the record: toward an ethnography of practice

2014· article· en· W579006457 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueChoice Reviews Online · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographyOral historyHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword Steven High Introduction: Toward an Ethnography of Practice Anna Sheftel and Stacey Zembrzycki PART I: REFLECTIONS ON A LIFETIME OF LISTENING Section Introduction: Henry Greenspan 1. From California to Kufr Nameh and Back: Reflections on Forty Years of Feminist Oral History Sherna Berger Gluck 2. On and Off the in Shifting Times and Circumstances Julie Cruikshank and Tatiana Argounova 3. Politics and Praxis in Canadian Working-Class Oral History Joan Sangster PART II: ENCOUNTERS IN VULNERABILITY, FAMILIARITY, AND FRIENDSHIP Section Introduction: Hourig Attarian 4. The Vulnerable Listener Martha Norkunas 5. Listen and Learn: Familiarity and Feeling in the Oral History Interview Alan Wong 6. Going Places: Helping Youth with Refugee Experiences Take Their Stories Public Elizabeth Miller 7. Not Just Another Interviewee: Befriending a Holocaust Survivor Stacey Zembrzycki PART III: THE INTERSECTION OF ETHICS AND POLITICS Section Introduction: Leyla Neyzi 8. Can Hear Lois Now: Corrections to My Story of the Internment of Japanese Canadians - For the Record Pamela Sugiman 9. Third Parties in 'Third Spaces': Reflecting on the Role of the Translator in Oral History Interviews with Iraqi Diasporic Women Nadia Jones-Gailani 10. If you told me you wanted to talk about the '60s, wouldn't have called you back: Reflections on Collective Memory and the Practice of Oral History Nancy Janovicek 11. The Ethical Murk of Using Testimony in Oral Historical Research in South Africa Monica Eileen Patterson PART IV: CONSIDERING SILENCE Section Introduction: Erin Jessee 12. Toward an Ethics of Silence? Negotiating Off-the-Record Events and Identity in Oral History Alexander Freund 13. The Heart of Activism in Colombia: Reflections on Activism and Oral History Research in a Conflict Area Luis van Isschot 14. I don't fancy history very much: Reflections on Interviewee Recruitment and Refusal in Bosnia-Herzegovina Anna Sheftel Afterword Alessandro Portelli

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0150.018
Scholarly communication0.0140.016
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChoice Reviews OnlineSame topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207