MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W583895045 · doi:10.60082/0829-3929.1043

The Meaning of Compensation in Institutional Abuse Programs

2002· article· en· W583895045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Law and Social Policy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCorruption and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)Compensation (psychology)PsychologySocial psychologyBusinessPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RItsUMItLes cas de mauvais traitements en 6tablissement comportent un pr6judice personnel A la fois sur le plan psychologique et sur le plan physique.La violence physique et la violence sexuelle ont une incidence sur le sens qu'a une personne d'elle-meme, sur son sens d'int6grit6 et sur son sens de capacit6 ou de pouvoir d'exister comme une personne distincte de l'agresseur.En plus des autres d6fis qu'elles posent, les demandes fond6es sur des mauvais traitements sont difficiles A examiner dans le cadre d'un processus judiciaire ou non judiciaire, car toute tentative d'6tudier les pr6judices de base qui r6sultent du mauvais traitement doit essayer de r6pondre A la nature tr~s personnelle des pr6judices caus6s par les mauvais traitements et qui ne se traduisent pas facilement en une valeur mon6taire.... is power always in a subordinate position relative to the economy?Is it always in the service of, and ultimately answerable to, the economy?Is its essential end and purpose to serve the economy?Is it destined to realise, consolidate, maintain and reproduce the relations appropriate to the economy and essential to its functioning?... is power modelled upon the economy?' (2002) 17 Journal of Law and Social Policy on her 4 sense of wholeness, and on her sense of ability or power to exist as a person apart from the abuser.Aside from other challenges, abuse claims are difficult to address through a judicial or alternative non-judicial process because any attempt to address the core injuries that result from abuse must try to respond to the highly personal nature of abuse injuries which do not easily translate to a monetary value. The ProblemTypically, in non-judicial compensation programs, the institutional authorities provide some form of non-monetary package that attempts to address the personal needs of survivors with appropriate means.For example, the following non-monetary benefits can be provided to achieve personal goals: " therapy and other health services to achieve healing; " provision of an apology to work toward restoring relationships; public education and institutional reforms to prevent further abuse; * the establishment of an historic record or memorials to acknowledge and bear witness to the abuse;* participation in the resolution process to promote the empowerment of survivors; and, * provision of retraining and educational opportunities to enable transformation or the recapture of lost educational opportunities. 5Such efforts go some way toward addressing the personal needs of survivors of abuse, at least partially because they directly address particular injuries and therefore carry a clear meaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it