MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W584773110

Intellectual property in the global marketplace

2002· book· en· W584773110 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJohn Wiley & Sons eBooks · 2002
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCopyright and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntellectual propertyContext (archaeology)European unionLegislationTangible propertyThe InternetIntangible propertyBusinessGoods and servicesLaw and economicsCommercePolitical scienceLawInternational tradeEconomicsEconomyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PREFACE. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. PART I: THE NEW MARKETPLACE: THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN ON--LINE COMMERCE. CHAPTER 4A: PATENT STRATEGIES IN THE ERA OF THE INTERNET (NEW) (MARIA ELISEEVA, CARL OPPEDAHL). 4A.1 Patentability of Software and Business Methods in the Context of the Internet. 4A.2 Claim and Specification Drafting Approaches for Internet--Related Patents. 4A.3 Prior User Defense. 4A.4 Products of Patented Processes. 4A.5 Appendix. PART III: PROTECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. CHAPTER 14A: UPDATE TO PARALLEL IMPORTS INTO AND WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION (NEW) (STUART JACKSON, RICHARD KEMPNER). 14A.1 Parallel Imports from Outside the EEA. 14A.2 Parallel Imports Within the EEA. 14A.3 Studies, Reports, and Legislation. CHAPTER 16A: COPYRIGHT AND E--COMMERCE (NEW) (DANIEL J. GERVAIS, ESQ.). 16A.1 Copyright, E--Commerce, and the World Wide Web. 16A.2 Defining the Concepts. 16A.3 ECMS Issues and Obstacles.16A.4 Inventory of Existing Systems. 16A.5 Conclusion: The Way Forward. PART IV: COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. CHAPTER 25: THE ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS: THE EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE (MORAG MACDONALD, AUDREY HORTON). 25.3 Patents. 25.5 Trademarks. 25.7 Database Right. 25.13 EC Competition Law Issues. PART V: TAKING A SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. CHAPTER 31: INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON SECURITY INTERESTS IN INTANGIBLE ASSETS: AUSTRALIA (SIMON D. WILLIAMS, KATE JOHNSTON, JOHN M. K. AFARAS). 31.2A Goods and Services Tax on Transactions Concerning Intellectual Property: A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (New). CHAPTER 33: INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON SECURITY INTERESTS IN INTANGIBLE ASSETS: CANADA (GERVAS W. WALL, ESQ.). 33.2 Relevant Legislation. 33.3 Canadian Federal Intellectual Property Statutes and Their Relation to Security Interests. CHAPTER 40: INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON SECURITY INTERESTS IN INTANGIBLE ASSETS: FRANCE (JEAN--PIERRE STENGER). 40.1 Introduction. 40.2 The Pledge of Intellectual Property Rights Taken Individually. 40.3 The Pledge of a Business as a Going Concern. 40.4 Conclusion.CHAPTER 43: INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON SECURITY INTERESTS IN INTANGIBLE ASSETS: HONG KONG (LINDSAY B. ESLER). 43.8 Trademarks. 43.9 Patents. CHAPTER 51: INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON SECURITY INTERESTS IN INTANGIBLE ASSETS: KOREA (SOON YUNG CHA, ESQ. YOON KUN CHA, ESQ.). 51.1 Introduction. 51.3 Security Interests in Intellectual Property Rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it