MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W588085037

Las matemáticas que realizan los niños al compartir

2015· article· es· W588085037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Psychology Estudios de Psicología · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtContext (archaeology)Geography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEl proposito de compartir es construir conjuntos equivalentes, un contexto ideal para el analisis de importantes conceptos cuantitativos como contar, equivalencia y cardinalidad. Mediante dos estudios se analizo como ninos de cuatro y cinco anos de edad comparten bloques en condiciones de reparto equitativo y de reciprocidad (en esta segunda situacion, un muneco partia, antes del reparto, con el doble de elementos que el otro) y se analizaron tambien sus inferencias cuantitativas realizadas sobre una coleccion, despues de contar los bloques de la otra. La investigadora pidio a los ninos que repartieran bloques dobles e individuales entre dos personajes. Los ninos tuvieron mas exito en la situacion de reparto equitativo que en la de reciprocidad. La mayoria de los ninos que tuvieron exito al compartir tambien hicieron inferencias numericas apropiadas. En el segundo estudio se emplearon monedas canadienses de uno y dos dolares para examinar la importancia de las senales perceptivas al compartir. Mientras que los bloques dobles tienen el doble de tamano de los individuales, no hay senales perceptivas que permitieran a los ninos comparar las monedas porque son todas del mismo tamano. Contrariamente a las expectativas, compartir con las monedas no fue mas dificil que con los bloques y la mayoria de los ninos realizaron inferencias numericas EnglishThe purpose of sharing is to construct equivalent sets, making it an ideal context for analysing important quantitative concepts such as counting, equivalence and cardinality. Two studies analysed how four- and five-year-olds shared blocks in equal sharing and reciprocity conditions and their number inferences about one set after counting the other. The researcher asked children to share double and single blocks between two characters. They succeeded more in building equivalent shares in an equal sharing than reciprocity condition. Most children who shared correctly also made appropriate number inferences. To examine whether perceptual cues helped children share the blocks, a second study used Canadian $1 and $2 coins. A double block is twice the size of a single, whereas there is no visual cue about the value relation between coins because they are the same size. Unexpectedly, children shared equally well with blocks and coins, and most children made number inferences

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it