Liberal Internationalism, the League of Nations Union, and the Mandates System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the emergence of liberal internationalism in Great Britain following the First World War. Britain was an active participant in post-war international organizations, in part to maintain its status as an imperial power. This participation had both official and non-official support. The League of Nations Union (LNU), in particular, was a strong advocate of liberal internationalism, especially the mandates system that emerged from the peace settlement. The mandates system promised a more liberal relationship between European and colonial peoples in the form of trusteeship, yet conflicts over sovereignty between the mandatory powers, the League of Nations’ Permanent Mandates Commission in Geneva, and indigenous actors compromised the system’s effectiveness. The article sheds light on the early twentieth-century development of non-governmental interest groups, the increasingly important role of international organizations to domestic British politics, and the ongoing (re)construction of Britain’s national identities; and the emergence of the international community between the wars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it