MétaCan
← all works

The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level : an ICMI study

2001· book· en· 388 citations· W597440641 on OpenAlex· 10.1007/0-306-47231-7

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread
0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Preface. Section I: Introduction. Why the Professor Must be a Stimulating Teacher: Towards a New Paradigm of Teaching Mathematics at University Level C. Alsina. Changing Contexts in Tertiary Mathematics: Implications for Diversity and Equity R. Zevenbergen. Policy Issues J. Thomas. Policy Case Studies. Policy Issues Concerning Teaching at University Level in France J.-L. Dorier, V. Durand-Guerrier. Mathematics Education in Chinese Universities X. Longwan. Policy in Sweden A. Tengstrand. Section 2: Practice. Trends in Curriculum: A Working Group Report J. Hillel. Mathematical Teaching Practices at Tertiary Level: Working Group Report J. Mason. The Secondary-Tertiary Interface L. Wood. The Warwick Analysis Project: Practice and Theory L. Alcock, A. Simpson. Professional Development for Changing Undergraduate Mathematics Instruction H. Keynes, A. Olson. Scientific Debate in Mathematics Courses M. Legrand. Making Large Lectures Effective: An Effort to Increase Student Success K. Millett. University Mathematics Based on Problem-Oriented Student Projects: 25 Years of Experience with the Roskilde Model M. Niss. The Active/Interactive Classroom D. Smith. Departmental Profiles. Concordia University, Montreal, Canada J. Hillel. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule, Zurich, Switzerland U. Kirchgraber. Universidad Nacional Del Literal, Santa Fe, Argentina N. Aguilera, R. Marcias. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. University of Joensuu, Finland M. Pesonen. Section 3: Research. What Can We Learn from Educational Research at the University Level? M. Artigue. Purposes and Methods of Research in Mathematics Education A. Schoenfeld. TertiaryMathematics Education Research and its Future A. Selden, J. Selden. Research into the Teaching and Learning of Linear Algebra J.-L. Dorier, A. Sierpinska. APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research E. Dubinski, M. McDonald. Research on the Teaching and Learning of Calculus/Elementary Analysis A. Robert, N. Speer. Section 4: Mathematics and Other Disciplines. Revolution by Stealth: Redefining University Mathematics L. Steen. Mathematics and Other Subjects J.-P. Bourguignon. Trying the Impossible: Teaching Mathematics to Physicists and Engineers B. Kummerer. Do Not Ask What Mathematics Can do for Modelling. Ask What Modelling Can do for Mathematics! J. Ottesen. Section 5: Technology. Technology: A Working Group Report K. King, et al. Technology in College Statistics Courses J. Garfield, et al. Computer Algebra Systems in the Learning and Teaching of Linear Algebra: Some Examples J. Hillel. Reflections on the Sustained Use of Technology in Undergraduate Mathematics Education E. Muller. Finding a Role for Technology in Service Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists P. Kent, R. Noss. Section 6: Assessment. Assessing Undergraduate Mathematics Students K. Houston. Assessing Mathematical Thinking Via FLAG J. Ridgway, et al. Assessing Student Project Work C. Haines, K. Houston. Section 7: Teacher Education. Preparation of Primary and Secondary Mathematics Teachers: A Working Group Report H. Williams. Using Research to Inform Pre-Service Teacher Education Programmes T. Cooney. Mathematicians and the Preparation of Elementary Teachers C. Kessel, L. Ma. Mathematics Teachers' Education in France: From Academic Training to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Topic
Mathematics Education and Programs
Field
Mathematics
Canadian institutions
Funders
Keywords
Mathematics educationCurriculumHigher educationMathematicsLibrary sciencePedagogySociologyComputer sciencePolitical science
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes