MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W602742632

"One's Bad and the Other One's Worse": Differences in Economic Integration between Asylum Seekers and Refugees Selected Abroad

2003· article· en· W602742632 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean Renaud, Victor Piché, Jean‐François Godin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeImmigrationSettlement (finance)Political scienceDemographic economicsHumanitiesDemographySociologyEthnologyLawEconomicsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT/RESUME The socio-economic settlement of refugees generates considerable interest in Canada and Quebec because, while the basis for this type of immigration is primarily humanitarian, the success of refugees' economic integration remains an objective in itself. One of the limits of previous studies is that they examine refugees as a monolithic group. In fact, there are basically two categories of refugees in Canada: those selected overseas and those who claim refugee status while in Canada. The former seemed to have received the most attention. The purpose of this study is to examine the difference in economic integration between these two groups using a longitudinal approach. Our hypothesis, that asylum seekers face more difficulty in the labour market than accepted (landed) refugees, is borne out. The explanation for this difference does not lie in human capital factors (qualification, prior work experience, and language), in demographic variables such as sex and age, in differences in national origin, nor in taking courses, since these factors have been included in the analysis. This article examines two sets of explanatory hypotheses: one based on the crisis effect and the other on the stigmatisation effect. L'insertion socio-economique des refugies suscite beaucoup d'interet au Canada et au Quebec car, meme si des considerations humanitaires sont a la base de ce type d'immigration, le succes de leur insertion economique demeure un objectif en soi. Une des limites des recherches anterieures est de considerer les refugies comme un groupe monolithique. En fait, il existe deux categories de refugies au Canada : les refugies selectionnes a l'etranger et ceux qui reclament le statut de refugie sur place. C'est le premier groupe qui a surtout retenu l'attention. L'objectif du present texte est d'examiner l'insertion economique differentielle de ces deux groupes a l'aide de donnees longitudinales. Notre hypothese, a savoir que les revendicateurs de statut auront plus de difficulte sur le marche du travail que les refugies selectionnes, se trouve confirmee par nos analyses. Ni les facteurs de capital humain (qualification, experience de travail anterieur, langue), ni les variables demographiques comme le sexe et l'age, ni les origines nationales et ni le fait de suivre des cours ne peuvent expliquer les differences puisque tous ces facteurs sont pris en compte dans l'analyse. Cet article explore deux series d'hypotheses explicatives, l'une basee sur la notion de > et l'autre sur l'effet de stigmatisation. INTRODUCTION The extremely stressful situation that characterizes refugees forces them to flee their country in search of protection and asylum in the host country. Thus, their emigration is rarely planned. Not only must they cope with the shock of leaving their homeland, but they must also face the new realities that await them in the receiving society. The socio-economic settlement of refugees generates considerable interest in Canada and Quebec because, while the reason for migration is primarily humanitarian, the success of their economic integration remains an objective in itself. Between 1995 and 1999, Quebec received more than 36,000 refugees, comprising 26 percent of the total number of immigrants to the province. More than half, nearly 19,000, were accepted as asylum seekers, while the rest were essentially refugees selected overseas (most often from refugee camps) to enter Canada with landed immigrant status and the right of permanent residence. In terms of asylum claimants, they must undergo a rather lengthy acceptance process (the median wait being 22 months for those who go through all of the application steps in three years or less). This process comprised two steps--the first involves obtaining refugee status and the second involves obtaining permanent residence. These claimants, like other refugees, must meet the Geneva Convention definition, but at the same time they do not know what ruling will be made by the Canadian Immigration Commission. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207