Social Creativity and Post-Rural Places: The Case of Montemor-O-Novo, Portugal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article discusses a particularly successful example of arts-based social creativity in a rural setting: case of Montemor-o-Novo, in Southern Portugal. The article is divided into three parts: first one critically reviews literature on relationships between arts, creativity and social change; second provides a historical-geographical account of trajectory of Montemor-o-Novo and highlights its social creative dimensions; and third part puts forth a number of conclusions on post-rurality as a distinctive strategy of socially creative local development. [Social Creativity and Post-Rural Places: The Case of Montemor-O-Novo, Portugal] > Cet article jette un regard et analyse une experience particulierement bien reussie de creativite sociale basee sur les arts dans un contexte rural: le cas de Montemor-o-Novo, situe dans le Sud du Portugal L'article est divise en trois sections: la premiere section fait etat de quelques contributions theoriques sur les relations entre les arts, la creativite et le changement social; la deuxieme, trace un portrait historico-geographique de la municipalite et met l'accent sur sa creativite sociale; et, finalement, la troisieme section propose quelques conclusions a propos de la post-ruralite en tant que strategie distinctive de developpement local socialement creatif. Introduction This article looks at a particularly successful example of arts-based social creativity in a rural setting: case of Montemor-o-Novo, in Southern Portugal. It is argued that analysis of its trajectory cannot be satisfactorily made with recourse solely to usual interpretive categories from conceptual and theoretical debates on creative cities and social innovation in urban settings: while essential to understanding dynamics that have been taking place in Montemor-o-Novo, those categories need to be complemented with an understanding of specific ways in which rurality and post-rurality have been mobilised in this particular context. In order to do this, article begins by critically reviewing some of insights from literature on creativity, arts and social change; on role of arts in place development; on public art and public spaces; and on socially creative milieux: This is followed by an account of trajectory of Montemor-o-Novo as an example of arts-based social creativity. Finally, some conclusions are drawn on post-rurality as strategy for socially creative local development. Social Creativity Creativity, Arts and Social Change If we regard culture as the creative element of our existence--expressions of who we are, where we come from, and where we wish to go (Jeannotte and Stanley 2002:136), passage into post-modernity has certainly provided culture, and arts in particular, with a much more central role both in people's lives and in lives of their communities. From 1970s onwards, certainties that characterised grand visions of world that underlay modernity have given way to doubt, inconstancy and 'dreamlike fickleness'. The loss of sense of transcendent (Ruby 2002) is, in a way, overcome through arts. Yet, in different ways, arts have also contributed to representing and even anticipating future: Some artists express in their work feelings or codes that forecast future or that indicate symbolically that present is no longer viable (Smiers 2005: 9). It is this latter capacity that is most crucial in context of uncertainty that characterises post-modernity. In this context, aesthetisation of daily life (Smiers 2005; Ley 2003) has proceeded apace. Increasingly, human body, home, and city have become targets par excellence of interventions driven more by celebration of aesthetics than by values of utility (Ley 2003). …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".