The transatlantic divide : foreign and security policies in the Atlantic Alliance from Kosovo to Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction - Osvaldo Croci and Amy Verdun PART 1 - The international context 1. Transatlantic security relations from Kosovo to Iraq - Stanley Sloan 2. NATO after Atlanticism - David Long 3. Which Venus? A normative reading of the transatlantic divide - Sonia Lucarelli 4. From out of adversity: Kosovo, Iraq and ESDP - Anand Menon 5. Kosovo, Iraq, and the evolution of the theory and practice of humanitarian intervention - Francis K. Abiew 6. Managing multilateralism? EU-US relations and the challenges of regime building in South-eastern Europe - Lenard Cohen 7. Kosovo and Iraq: two test cases for the partnership between post-Soviet Russia and the West - Isabelle Facon PART II - The domestic contexts 8. From compellence to pre-emption: Kosovo and Iraq as US responses to contested hegemony - Michael Wallack 9. Competing for leadership in West European defence: France, Great Britain and the wars in Kosovo and Iraq - Alex MacLeod 10. Between Kosovo and Iraq: changing paradigms of German foreign and security policy? - Udo Diedrichs 11. A tale of two coalitions: Italy faces Kosovo and Iraq - Osvaldo Croci 12. The neutral states and the challenge of ESDP: Kosovo, Iraq, and the transatlantic divide - Nicholas Rees 13. A change of road: Canadian foreign policy from Kosovo to Iraq - Bill McGrath Conclusion - Osvaldo Croci and Amy Verdun Bibliography
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".