MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W630906684 · doi:10.2307/jj.41003799.19

A Local Community Monitors Wildlife along a Major Transportation Corridor

2012· article· en· W630906684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracy Lee, Michael S. Quinn, Danah Duke

Bibliographic record

VenuePrinceton University Press eBooks · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildlifeCitizen scienceGeospatial analysisGeographyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningWildlife conservationGlobal Positioning SystemHuman settlementTransport engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringEcologyRemote sensingEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter on how a local community monitors wildlife along a major transportation corridor is from a book on highways, wildlife, and habitat connectivity. The authors stress that the successful development of wildlife transportation mitigation strategies requires access to timely, accurate information on the spatial and temporal movement patterns of wildlife. They describe the citizen science framework established by the Miistakis Institute for wildlife and transportation issues in the Crowsnest Pass of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. The Crowsnest corridor consists of a two-lane highway, a railway line, and five principle settlements. The Road Watch model was developed to create a valuable data set of large mammal observations for use by decision makers and the community; to highlight the value of data collected by volunteers to the local community, decision makers, and the academic community; and to create an environment where citizens can learn and share knowledge about local wildlife and conservation issues (i.e., community capacity building). Citizens can contribute to Road Watch in three ways: submit observations through an interactive Web-based mapping tool; report through a telephone hotline; and participate in systematic wildlife surveys of the Crowsnest corridor using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) unit that has a species key pad. The authors discuss some of the challenges that are typical of citizen science projects, including data accuracy concerns, the opportunistic nature of data collection, and sustaining volunteer participation. The dataset created has been used to inform numerous conservation planning processes. The authors conclude that Road Watch is a successful model for increasing individual knowledge on wildlife movement and collision zones in the region. A qualitative study done to evaluate the project suggests that participation has resulted in some behavioral change, including self-described changes in driving behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrinceton University Press eBooksSame topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207