Confronting mass democracy and industrial technology : political and social theory from Nietzsche to Habermas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Democracy and technology in intellectual life of ill-fated John P. McCormick Yale University I Rationality and politics at outset of century Love, passion and maturity: Nietzche and Weber on science, morality and politics Tracy B. Strong University of California, San Diego II Strategies of progressive political action in an age of technological transformation Post-Utopian Marxism: Lukacs and dilemmas of organization Andrew Feenberg San Diego State University Herbert Marcuse: A critical retrospective from Berlin to Berkeley Richard Wolin City University of New York III Socio-literary theory: Unlikely sources for a critique of capitalism? History lesson on S-Bahn: Brecht's cartography of capital Richard Dienst Rutgers University The Geist in machine: Freud, uncanny and technology Gia Pascarelli Sacred Hear University IV Society and state as machine in Weimar Republic and Third Reich The soul in age of society and technology: Helmuth Plessner's defensive liberalism Jan-Werner Muller All Souls College, Oxford University Leviathan in 1930s: The reception of Hobbes in Third Reich David Dyzenhaus University of Toronto V Theories of technocracy in two post-war Germanies Revisionism and orthodoxy: Stalinism and political thought in German Democratic Republic's founding decade Peter C. Caldwell Rice University Unsolved paradoxes: Conservative political thought in Adenauer's Germany William E. Scheuerman University of Minnesota VI Throwing off yoke of the German Master Destruktion or recovery?: Leo Strauss's critique of Heidegger Steven B. Smith Yale University A critical versus genealogical questioning of technology: Notes on how not to read Adorno and Horkheimer John P. McCormick Yale University Provocation and appropriation: Hannah Arendt's response to Heidegger Richard J. Bernstein The New School VII Critical democratic theory at century's end: Law, language, gender, culture Disembodying democracy: Gendered discourse in Habermas's legalistic turn Nancy S. Love Pennsylvania State University Reversing dialectic of enlightenment: The Reenchantment of world Seylia Benhabib Harvard University
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".