Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword Professor Dr Andre Habisch, Catholic University of Eichstaett and Managing Director, Center for Corporate Citizenship Introduction Jorg Andriof, Corporate Citizenship Unit, Warwick Business School, UK Part I: Evolution, context and concepts of corporate citizenship 1. Integrity and mindfulness: Foundations of corporate citizenship Sandra Waddock, Boston College, Carroll School of Management, USA 2. Corporate citizenship: Evolution and interpretation Duane Windsor, Rice University, USA 3. Corporate citizenship: Rethinking business beyond corporate social responsibility David Birch, Corporate Citizenship Research Unit, Deakin University, Australia 4. Global corporate citizenship in a dot.com world: The role of organisational identity James E. Post and Shawn L. Berman, Boston University, USA 5. Theorising business citizenship Donna J. Wood, University of Pittsburgh, USA, and Jeanne M. Logsdon, University of New Mexico, USA 6. Business citizenship outside and inside organisations: An emergent synthesis of corporate responsibility and employee citizenship Diane Swanson and Brian P. Niehoff, Kansas State University, USA Part II: Governance and leadership of corporate citizens 7. Corporate citizenship as an ethic of care: Corporate values, codes of ethics and global governance Michel Dion, Universite de Sherbrooke, Canada 8. The moral leader: Essential for successful corporate citizenship Archie B. Carroll, University of Georgia, USA 9. How Australia's top 500 companies are becoming corporate citizens Mark Glazebrook, Corporate Citizenship Research Unit, Deakin University, Australia 10. When multinational corporations act as governments: The Mobil corporation experience Alejo Jose G. Sison, Institute for Enterprise and Humanism, University of Navarre, Spain 11. The world's business: The United Nations and the globalisation of corporate citizenship Jonathan Cohen, United Nations Association of the USA Part 3: Stakeholder engagement and social accountability 12. Partnership alchemy: Engagement, innovation and governance Simon Zadek, Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility, UK 13. Patterns of stakeholder partnership building Jorg Andriof, Corporate Citizenship Unit, Warwick Business School, UK 14. A comparative study of stakeholder engagement approaches in social auditing Simon S. Gao, Napier University Business School, UK, and Jane J. Zhang, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK 15. Corporate citizenship: What gets recorded? What gets rewarded? Kimberly S. Davenport, BellSouth Corporation, USA, and Patsy Lewellyn, University of South Carolina Aiken, USA 16. Processes in social and ethical accountability: external reporting mechanisms Leigh Holland, De Montfort University, UK, and Jane Gibbon, Newcastle Business School, University of Northumbria, UK Bibliography
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it