MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W653202018

Fleet Stats '06: The Order of Things

2006· article· en· W653202018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgressive railroading · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckQuarter (Canadian coin)Transport engineeringPaceOrder (exchange)BusinessEngineeringAgricultural economicsFinanceEconomicsAutomotive engineeringGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article suggests that the market for freight cars will continue to be brisk in 2006 if the first quarter of the year is any indication. Last year’s new-car acquisitions totaled more than 68,000, the largest since 1999 and an increase of 46.4 percent over 2004’s total. During the first quarter of 2006, rail-car deliveries totaled 18,542. If that pace continues, there could be more than 74,000 cars delivered this year. The reasons for the run on rail cars include a relatively good U.S. economy, growth in the intermodal, coal and merchandise segments of the market, and more truck-to-rail diversions. Ethanol production has also led to a surge in orders. Included in the Fleet Stats ’06 are the following statistics: 1) selected car fleet data; 2) railroad car owners; 3) private car owners; 4) changes in the U.S. freight car fleet; 5) U.S. freight cars by type and age; and, 6) Class I locomotives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it