MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888573380 · doi:10.20381/ruor-30649

Exploring the Relationships Between Food Insecurity, Maternal Stress and Maternal / Infant Health Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A DOHaD Framework

2024· article· en· W6888573380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa - Library · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusPregnancyBirth weightPandemicLow birth weightOffspringPublic healthStressorPrenatal care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse psychosocial, lifestyle and environmental exposures during the first 1,000 days of life can result in undesirable offspring health outcomes, including increased risk of chronic diseases in adulthood. Food insecurity (FI) and heightened stress are factors that may contribute to adverse developmental programming events, which were exacerbated for many Canadians during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to examine the relationships between maternal FI and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic and how they were associated with maternal gestational weight gain (GWG) and newborn birth weight in a Canadian pregnant cohort. Data were collected retrospectively from 273 pregnant participants of varying socioeconomic status who were pregnant and delivered infants during the pandemic (March 2020-March 2023). The participants responded to an online survey developed from previously validated questionnaires addressing FI, pandemic-related stress, self-reported GWG, and infant birth weight. Over half (55%) of the participants experienced household FI, while one fifth (20%) reported heightened stress related to pregnancy preparedness and over one third (34%) reported heightened stress related to COVID-19 infection. Participants from food secure and insecure households differed significantly in age, sexual orientation, household type, total household income, housing status, number of kids in the household and whether the pregnancy was planned or unplanned (p < 0.01). Heightened stress was also significantly associated these same factors except from age group and housing status (p < 0.05). GWG outside the recommended guidelines was reported by 77% of participants; however, no associations were observed with FI or pandemic-related stress. Infant birth weight extremes (small or large for gestational age) were reported by 32% of participants. While no associations were observed with FI status, positive associations between birth weight extremes and heightened stress related to both pregnancy preparedness and COVID-19 infection were found (p < 0.02). The results of this study provide a better understanding of the extent of FI, gestational stress, and factors potentially influencing them during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Canadian pregnant population. Recognizing the specific challenges faced by vulnerable pregnant populations can guide tailored interventions and programs aimed at improving maternal and infant health and well-being during emergency/pandemics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.307
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.081 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it