MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894084301 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6081990

Amblyseius andersoni Chant 1957

2016· article· en· W6894084301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch on scale insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmblyseiusPhytoseiidaeLantanaPanonychus ulmiPEAR

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amblyseius andersoni (Chant, 1957) Typhlodromus andersoni Chant, 1957: 296. Amblyseius andersoni.—Athias-Henriot, 1958b: 33. Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) andersoni.—Chant, 1959: 92. Amblyseius (Amblyseius) andersoni.—Muma, 1961: 287. Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) andersoni.—Westerboer & Bernhard, 1963: 682. Amblyseius (Multiseius) andersoni.— Denmark & Muma, 1989: 84. Amblyseius andersoni.—Moraes et al., 2004: 14; Chant & McMurtry, 2007: 75. This species is distributed world-wide but is mainly reported from Europe. It has been observed on many plants especially crops such as orchards (apple, peach, pear and citrus) and vineyards, particularly in humid areas (Chant & Hansell, 1971; Papadoulis & Emmanouel, 1991; Gambaro, 1994; Papaioannou-Souliotis et al., 1994; Nicotina, 1996; Duso & Pasini, 2003; Ragusa, 2006). Several studies focused on the biology of A. andersoni and on its ability to feed on plant pests. It is reported to feed on Panonychus ulmi (Koch), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Koveos & Broufas, 2000; Fischer & Mourrut-Salesse, 2005; Houten et al., 2005; Lorenzon et al., 2012). This species was known from Morocco on citrus (Tixier et al., 2003). With 218 specimens collected, it was one of the most abundant species. It has been observed in various locations all situated on the Atlantic Ocean coast, probably because of the high relative humidity in this region. Specimens examined: 2002, Damon Oum Er Bia river on Echium arenarium (Boraginaceae) (2 females), Lantana sp. (Verbenaceae) (9 females, 3 males), Malva sp. (Malvaceae) (4 females); 2003, near Larache on Quercus suber (Fagaceae) (15 females, 5 males), Erica arborea (Ericaceae) (20 females, 6 males), Chamaerops humilis (Arecaceae) (23 females, 6 males), Acacia dealbata (Fabaceae) (10 females, 3 males), Calycotome villosa (Fabaceae) (4 females), Asphodelus fistulosus (Xanthorrhoeaceae) (13 females), Daphne gnidium (Thymelaeaceae) (12 females), Knautia purpurea (Caprifoliaceae) (10 females), Cistus parviflorus (7 females), Cistus salveafolius (Cistaceae) (2 females), Lavandula stoechas (12 females), Mentha pulegium (Lamiaceae) (25 females, 7 males), Myrtus communis (Myrtaceae) (22 females, 5 males), Rumex bicephalophorus (Polygonaceae) (1 female), Mazari Cape on Centaurium erythraea (Gentianaceae) (2 females), Larache on Solanum sodomaceum (Solanaceae), Road to Souk El Arba on Cistus libanotis (Cistaceae) (2 females), Larache Beach on Solanum sodomaceum (Solanaceae) (3 females), Polygonum maritimum (Polygonaceae) (1 female). Previous records: Algeria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Jordan, Japan, Moldova, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, The Netherlands, Turkey, Ukraine, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicResearch on scale insectsFrench-language works237,207