MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894084301 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6081990

Amblyseius andersoni Chant 1957

2016· article· en· W6894084301 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch on scale insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmblyseiusPhytoseiidaeLantanaPanonychus ulmiPEAR

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amblyseius andersoni (Chant, 1957) Typhlodromus andersoni Chant, 1957: 296. Amblyseius andersoni.—Athias-Henriot, 1958b: 33. Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) andersoni.—Chant, 1959: 92. Amblyseius (Amblyseius) andersoni.—Muma, 1961: 287. Typhlodromus (Typhlodromus) andersoni.—Westerboer & Bernhard, 1963: 682. Amblyseius (Multiseius) andersoni.— Denmark & Muma, 1989: 84. Amblyseius andersoni.—Moraes et al., 2004: 14; Chant & McMurtry, 2007: 75. This species is distributed world-wide but is mainly reported from Europe. It has been observed on many plants especially crops such as orchards (apple, peach, pear and citrus) and vineyards, particularly in humid areas (Chant & Hansell, 1971; Papadoulis & Emmanouel, 1991; Gambaro, 1994; Papaioannou-Souliotis et al., 1994; Nicotina, 1996; Duso & Pasini, 2003; Ragusa, 2006). Several studies focused on the biology of A. andersoni and on its ability to feed on plant pests. It is reported to feed on Panonychus ulmi (Koch), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Koveos & Broufas, 2000; Fischer & Mourrut-Salesse, 2005; Houten et al., 2005; Lorenzon et al., 2012). This species was known from Morocco on citrus (Tixier et al., 2003). With 218 specimens collected, it was one of the most abundant species. It has been observed in various locations all situated on the Atlantic Ocean coast, probably because of the high relative humidity in this region. Specimens examined: 2002, Damon Oum Er Bia river on Echium arenarium (Boraginaceae) (2 females), Lantana sp. (Verbenaceae) (9 females, 3 males), Malva sp. (Malvaceae) (4 females); 2003, near Larache on Quercus suber (Fagaceae) (15 females, 5 males), Erica arborea (Ericaceae) (20 females, 6 males), Chamaerops humilis (Arecaceae) (23 females, 6 males), Acacia dealbata (Fabaceae) (10 females, 3 males), Calycotome villosa (Fabaceae) (4 females), Asphodelus fistulosus (Xanthorrhoeaceae) (13 females), Daphne gnidium (Thymelaeaceae) (12 females), Knautia purpurea (Caprifoliaceae) (10 females), Cistus parviflorus (7 females), Cistus salveafolius (Cistaceae) (2 females), Lavandula stoechas (12 females), Mentha pulegium (Lamiaceae) (25 females, 7 males), Myrtus communis (Myrtaceae) (22 females, 5 males), Rumex bicephalophorus (Polygonaceae) (1 female), Mazari Cape on Centaurium erythraea (Gentianaceae) (2 females), Larache on Solanum sodomaceum (Solanaceae), Road to Souk El Arba on Cistus libanotis (Cistaceae) (2 females), Larache Beach on Solanum sodomaceum (Solanaceae) (3 females), Polygonum maritimum (Polygonaceae) (1 female). Previous records: Algeria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Jordan, Japan, Moldova, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, The Netherlands, Turkey, Ukraine, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it