MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894296393 · doi:10.5284/1128834

Manor Farm, Church Lane, West Rasen, West Lindsey, Lincolnshire: Historic Building Survey

2024· article· en· W6894296393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoorsPhotographyPlan (archaeology)State (computer science)Quarter (Canadian coin)EnclosureWest virginiaFront (military)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photography was undertaken in 35mm digital SLR colour photography (using a 10.4 Mpixel format). Photography was undertaken of the historic farm buildings to create a primary archive and included general shots of the site and detailed photography of room arrangement; main elevations and constructional details such as window openings, and fixtures and fittings, such as doors and window fenestration. At the time of the survey many of the outbuildings were in a poor state of repair: part of the north range had lost its roof and had partially collapsed. Some areas had also become extensively overgrown. Access in these areas was undertaken only when accompanied and some areas were not entered for safety reasons. None of the upper floors were accessed because of the state of the timbers. The buildings at Manor Farm provide physical evidence of the evolution of farming practices from the early 19th to the mid-20th century in rural Lincolnshire. Although the land is shown as undeveloped on the early 19th-century draft enclosure plan, a farm clearly existed on the site before the date of the late 19th-century first edition OS maps, which show it with the plan form largely seen now. The farm has been historically associated with the watermill to the north from the earliest available documentary sources. By the late 19th century, the farm had become a 'C-plan' farm with buildings closely arranged around a south-facing crewyard, representing an expensive and planned conversion to a crewyard arrangement of the high farming movement in central Lincolnshire. While it is clear that it incorporated elements of earlier farm buildings into its final form, it is difficult to interpret the precise form and nature of its forerunner, as only those elements of it which fitted the new arrangement were retained. Whilst the original buildings have lost many of their primary fixtures and fittings, their original layout and quality of construction - albeit with some alteration - allows them to be considered as a good example of a late 19th-century farm complex which retains some well-preserved elements, such as the two-storey barn and stable with hay loft over. This building survey has recorded and provided an archive of the farm outbuilding complex, to preserve it by record prior to demolition and the consequent loss of historic evidence contained in its fabric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207